Posterior atlantoaxial fixation: A cadaveric and fluoroscopic step-by-step technical guide
Author
Baaj, AliASattarov, Kamran
Skoch, Jesse
Abbasifard, Salman
Patel, AparS
Avila, MauricioJ
Walter, ChristinaM
Affiliation
Department of Surgery, Division of Neurosurgery, University of Arizona Medical CenterIssue Date
2015
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
MedKnowCitation
Posterior atlantoaxial fixation: A cadaveric and fluoroscopic step-by-step technical guide 2015, 6 (5):244 Surgical Neurology InternationalJournal
Surgical Neurology InternationalRights
Copyright: © 2015 Sattarov K. This is an open‑access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
Background: Atlantoaxial surgical fixation is widely employed treatment strategy for a myriad of pathologies affecting the stability of the atlantoaxial joint. The most common technique used in adults, and in certain cases in children, involves a posterior construct with C1 lateral mass screws, and C2 pars or pedicle screws. This technical note aims to provide a step‑by‑step guide to this procedure using cadaveric and fluoroscopic images. Methods: An embalmed, human, cadaveric, specimen was used for this study. The subject did not have obvious occipital‑cervical pathology. Dissections and techniques were performed to mimic actual surgical technique. Photographs were taken during each step, and the critical aspects of each step were highlighted. Fluoroscopic images from a real patient undergoing C1/C2 fixation were also utilized to further highlight the anatomic‑radiographic relationships. This study was performed without external or industry funding. Results: Photographic and radiographic pictures and drawings are presented to illustrate the pertinent anatomy and technical aspects of this technique. The nuances of each step, including complication avoidance strategies are also highlighted. Conclusions: Given the widespread utilization of this technique, described step‑by‑step guide is timely for surgeons and trainees alike.Description
UA Open Access Publishing FundISSN
2152-7806Version
Final published versionAdditional Links
http://www.surgicalneurologyint.com/text.asp?2015/6/5/244/156611ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.4103/2152-7806.156611
Scopus Count
Collections
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Copyright: © 2015 Sattarov K. This is an open‑access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License.