Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHorangic, Alexandra
dc.contributor.authorBerry, Kate A.
dc.contributor.authorWall, Tamara
dc.date.accessioned2016-12-07T03:01:03Z
dc.date.available2016-12-07T03:01:03Z
dc.date.issued2016-03-15
dc.identifier.citationInfluences on Stakeholder Participation in Water Negotiations: A Case Study from the Klamath Basin 2016, 29 (12):1421 Society & Natural Resourcesen
dc.identifier.issn0894-1920
dc.identifier.issn1521-0723
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/08941920.2016.1144837
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/621532
dc.description.abstractIn water governance, where problems are controversial and value laden, different forms of stakeholder involvement have become common and are frequently required. Stakeholder participation is often recognized as fundamental to the legitimacy and success of negotiated environmental decisions, but the intricacies of why stakeholders participate has received less attention. We examine factors that influenced stakeholder participation in the Klamath Basin Restoration Agreement and Klamath Hydroelectric Settlement Agreement of 2010. The research draws on in-depth, semistructured interviews of a sample recruited from stakeholder organizations in the Klamath River Basin. Results indicate that previous negative experiences did not translate into nonparticipation; divisions within seemingly aligned stakeholder organizations encouraged some stakeholders to participate and others to actively oppose negotiations; stakeholders' perceptions of power differentials encouraged both stakeholder participation and exclusion in negotiations; and concerns about relationship development during negotiations suggest that relationship building may be viewed as part of the negotiation process.
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherTAYLOR & FRANCIS INCen
dc.relation.urlhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/08941920.2016.1144837en
dc.rights© 2016 Taylor & Francis.en
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
dc.subjectEnvironmental conflicten
dc.subjectKlamath Basinen
dc.subjectnatural resources collaborationen
dc.subjectstakeholder participationen
dc.subjectwater governanceen
dc.titleInfluences on Stakeholder Participation in Water Negotiations: A Case Study from the Klamath Basinen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.contributor.departmentUniv Arizona, Inst Environmen
dc.identifier.journalSociety & Natural Resourcesen
dc.description.notePublished online: 15 Mar 2016; 18 month embargo.en
dc.description.collectioninformationThis item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.en
dc.eprint.versionFinal accepted manuscripten
refterms.dateFOA2017-09-15T00:00:00Z
html.description.abstractIn water governance, where problems are controversial and value laden, different forms of stakeholder involvement have become common and are frequently required. Stakeholder participation is often recognized as fundamental to the legitimacy and success of negotiated environmental decisions, but the intricacies of why stakeholders participate has received less attention. We examine factors that influenced stakeholder participation in the Klamath Basin Restoration Agreement and Klamath Hydroelectric Settlement Agreement of 2010. The research draws on in-depth, semistructured interviews of a sample recruited from stakeholder organizations in the Klamath River Basin. Results indicate that previous negative experiences did not translate into nonparticipation; divisions within seemingly aligned stakeholder organizations encouraged some stakeholders to participate and others to actively oppose negotiations; stakeholders' perceptions of power differentials encouraged both stakeholder participation and exclusion in negotiations; and concerns about relationship development during negotiations suggest that relationship building may be viewed as part of the negotiation process.


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Klamath_Article_Final.pdf
Size:
294.0Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Final Accepted Manuscript

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record