Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMatsuyama, Isamu
dc.contributor.authorNimmo, Francis
dc.contributor.authorKeane, James T.
dc.contributor.authorChan, Ngai H.
dc.contributor.authorTaylor, G. Jeffrey
dc.contributor.authorWieczorek, Mark A.
dc.contributor.authorKiefer, Walter S.
dc.contributor.authorWilliams, James G.
dc.date.accessioned2016-12-12T23:22:15Z
dc.date.available2016-12-12T23:22:15Z
dc.date.issued2016-08-28
dc.identifier.citationGRAIL, LLR, and LOLA constraints on the interior structure of the Moon 2016, 43 (16):8365 Geophysical Research Lettersen
dc.identifier.issn00948276
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/2016GL069952
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/621595
dc.description.abstractThe interior structure of the Moon is constrained by its mass, moment of inertia, and k(2) and h(2) tidal Love numbers. We infer the likely radius, density, and (elastic limit) rigidity of all interior layers by solving the inverse problem using these observational constraints assuming spherical symmetry. Our results do not favor the presence of a low rigidity transition layer between a liquid outer core and mantle. If a transition layer exists, its rigidity is constrained to 43-9+26GPa, with a preference for the high rigidity values. Therefore, if a transition layer exists, it is more likely to have a rigidity similar to that of the mantle (approximate to 70GPa). The total (solid and liquid) core mass fraction relative to the lunar mass is constrained to 0.0098-0.0094+0.0066 and 0.0198-0.0049+0.0026 for interior structures with and without a transition layer, respectively, narrowing the range of possible giant impact formation scenarios.
dc.description.sponsorshipNASA's Discovery Programen
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherGEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERSen
dc.relation.urlhttp://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/2016GL069952en
dc.rights© 2016. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.en
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
dc.subjectlunar interioren
dc.titleGRAIL, LLR, and LOLA constraints on the interior structure of the Moonen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.contributor.departmentUniv Arizona, Dept Planetary Sci, Lunar & Planetary Laben
dc.identifier.journalGeophysical Research Lettersen
dc.description.notePublished: 19 August 2016; 6 Month Embargo.en
dc.description.collectioninformationThis item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.en
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen
dc.contributor.institutionDepartment of Planetary Sciences; Lunar and Planetary Laboratory, University of Arizona; Tucson Arizona USA
dc.contributor.institutionDepartment of Earth and Planetary Sciences; University of California; Santa Cruz California USA
dc.contributor.institutionDepartment of Planetary Sciences; Lunar and Planetary Laboratory, University of Arizona; Tucson Arizona USA
dc.contributor.institutionDepartment of Planetary Sciences; Lunar and Planetary Laboratory, University of Arizona; Tucson Arizona USA
dc.contributor.institutionHawaii Institute of Geophysics and Planetology; University of Hawaii; Honolulu Háwaii USA
dc.contributor.institutionInstitut de Physique du Globe de Paris; Paris France
dc.contributor.institutionLunar and Planetary Institute; Houston Texas USA
dc.contributor.institutionJet Propulsion Laboratory; Institute of Technology; Pasadena California USA
refterms.dateFOA2017-02-20T00:00:00Z
html.description.abstractThe interior structure of the Moon is constrained by its mass, moment of inertia, and k(2) and h(2) tidal Love numbers. We infer the likely radius, density, and (elastic limit) rigidity of all interior layers by solving the inverse problem using these observational constraints assuming spherical symmetry. Our results do not favor the presence of a low rigidity transition layer between a liquid outer core and mantle. If a transition layer exists, its rigidity is constrained to 43-9+26GPa, with a preference for the high rigidity values. Therefore, if a transition layer exists, it is more likely to have a rigidity similar to that of the mantle (approximate to 70GPa). The total (solid and liquid) core mass fraction relative to the lunar mass is constrained to 0.0098-0.0094+0.0066 and 0.0198-0.0049+0.0026 for interior structures with and without a transition layer, respectively, narrowing the range of possible giant impact formation scenarios.


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Matsuyama_et_al-2016-Geophysic ...
Size:
874.6Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Final Published Version

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record