Earlier snowmelt reduces atmospheric carbon uptake in midlatitude subalpine forests
Name:
Winchell_et_al-2016-Geophysica ...
Size:
1.086Mb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Final Published Version
Affiliation
Univ Arizona, Dept Ecol & Evolutionary BiolUniv Arizona, Tree Ring Res Lab
Issue Date
2016-08-16
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNIONCitation
Earlier snowmelt reduces atmospheric carbon uptake in midlatitude subalpine forests 2016, 43 (15):8160 Geophysical Research LettersJournal
Geophysical Research LettersRights
© 2016. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
Previous work demonstrates conflicting evidence regarding the influence of snowmelt timing on forest net ecosystem exchange (NEE). Based on 15years of eddy covariance measurements in Colorado, years with earlier snowmelt exhibited less net carbon uptake during the snow ablation period, which is a period of high potential for productivity. Earlier snowmelt aligned with colder periods of the seasonal air temperature cycle relative to later snowmelt. We found that the colder ablation-period air temperatures during these early snowmelt years lead to reduced rates of daily NEE. Hence, earlier snowmelt associated with climate warming, counterintuitively, leads to colder atmospheric temperatures during the snow ablation period and concomitantly reduced rates of net carbon uptake. Using a multilinear-regression (R-2=0.79, P<0.001) relating snow ablation period mean air temperature and peak snow water equivalent (SWE) to ablation-period NEE, we predict that earlier snowmelt and decreased SWE may cause a 45% reduction in midcentury ablation-period net carbon uptake.Note
Issue online: 24 August 2016; 6 month embargo.ISSN
00948276Version
Final published versionSponsors
U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF) Graduate Research Fellowship (NSF) [DGE 1144083]; NSF-U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) joint program for Water Sustainability and Climate (USDA) [2012-67003-19802]; NSF Hydrological Sciences Program (NSF) [EAR1141764]; U.S. Department of Energy (DOE); USDA; NSF Niwot Ridge Long-Term Ecological Research program; DOE Office of Science through the AmeriFlux Management Project (AMP) at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory [7094866]Additional Links
http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/2016GL069769ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1002/2016GL069769