Name:
journal.pone.0160307.PDF
Size:
2.140Mb
Format:
PDF
Description:
FInal Published Version
Affiliation
Univ Arizona, Sch Govt & Publ PolicyIssue Date
2016-10-04
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCECitation
Empirical Models of Social Learning in a Large, Evolving Network 2016, 11 (10):e0160307 PLOS ONEJournal
PLOS ONERights
© 2016 Bener et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
This paper advances theories of social learning through an empirical examination of how social networks change over time. Social networks are important for learning because they constrain individuals' access to information about the behaviors and cognitions of other people. Using data on a large social network of mobile device users over a one-month time period, we test three hypotheses: 1) attraction homophily causes individuals to form ties on the basis of attribute similarity, 2) aversion homophily causes individuals to delete existing ties on the basis of attribute dissimilarity, and 3) social influence causes individuals to adopt the attributes of others they share direct ties with. Statistical models offer varied degrees of support for all three hypotheses and show that these mechanisms are more complex than assumed in prior work. Although homophily is normally thought of as a process of attraction, people also avoid relationships with others who are different. These mechanisms have distinct effects on network structure. While social influence does help explain behavior, people tend to follow global trends more than they follow their friends.ISSN
1932-6203PubMed ID
27701430Version
Final published versionSponsors
ADH gratefully acknowledges funding from the University of Arizona’s Institute of the Environment (www.environment.arizona.edu). ABB, BC, and PP gratefully acknowledge funding from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC; www.nserccrsng.gc.ca), under Engage Grant number EGP 448184-13. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.Additional Links
http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0160307ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1371/journal.pone.0160307
Scopus Count
Collections
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © 2016 Bener et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License.
Related articles
- Monophily in social networks introduces similarity among friends-of-friends.
- Authors: Altenburger KM, Ugander J
- Issue date: 2018 Apr
- Formation of homophily in academic performance: Students change their friends rather than performance.
- Authors: Smirnov I, Thurner S
- Issue date: 2017
- Competition between Homophily and Information Entropy Maximization in Social Networks.
- Authors: Zhao J, Liang X, Xu K
- Issue date: 2015
- Prestige and homophily predict network structure for social learning of medicinal plant knowledge.
- Authors: Bond MO, Gaoue OG
- Issue date: 2020
- Emergence of bursts and communities in evolving weighted networks.
- Authors: Jo HH, Pan RK, Kaski K
- Issue date: 2011

