Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLiou, Theodore G
dc.contributor.authorJensen, Judith L
dc.contributor.authorAllen, Sarah E
dc.contributor.authorBrayshaw, Sara J
dc.contributor.authorBrown, Mark A
dc.contributor.authorChatfield, Barbara
dc.contributor.authorKoenig, Joni
dc.contributor.authorMcDonald, Catherine
dc.contributor.authorPacker, Kristyn A
dc.contributor.authorPeet, Kimberly
dc.contributor.authorRadford, Peggy
dc.contributor.authorReineke, Linda M
dc.contributor.authorOtsuka, Kim
dc.contributor.authorWagener, Jeffrey S
dc.contributor.authorYoung, David
dc.contributor.authorMarshall, Bruce C
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-17T23:09:42Z
dc.date.available2017-01-17T23:09:42Z
dc.date.issued2016-04-29
dc.identifier.citationImproving performance in the detection and management of cystic fibrosis-related diabetes in the Mountain West Cystic Fibrosis Consortium 2016, 4 (1):e000183 BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Careen
dc.identifier.issn2052-4897
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/bmjdrc-2015-000183
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/621997
dc.description.abstractObjective: Cystic fibrosis (CF)-related diabetes (CFRD) is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Improved detection and management may improve outcomes; however, actual practice falls short of published guidelines. We studied efforts to improve CFRD screening and management in the Mountain West CF Consortium (MWCFC). Research design and methods: This is a prospective observational cohort study evaluating quality improvement by accredited CF centers in Arizona, Colorado, New Mexico, and Utah performed between 2002 and 2008. After Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval, centers evaluated adherence with CF Foundation guidelines for CFRD. Each center developed and implemented quality improvement plans to improve both screening and management. Centers were reassessed 1 year later. Results: Initially, each CF center had low adherence with screening recommendations (26.5% of eligible patients) that did not improve during the study. However, patients with confirmed CFRD markedly increased (141 (12% of MWCFC patients) to 224 (17%), p<0.001), and with improved adherence to management guidelines, patients with CFRD had increased weight (56.8-58.9 kg, p<0.001), body mass index (21.1-21.4, p=0.003), and weight-for-age z-score (-1.42 to -0.84, p<0.001). Quality improvement methods were specific to the practice settings of each center but shared the common goal of adhering to CFRD care guidelines. 1 year after implementation, no center significantly differed from any other in level of adherence to guidelines. Conclusions: Improving adherence with CFRD care guidelines requires substantial effort and may be incompletely successful, particularly for CFRD screening, but the effort may significantly improve patient monitoring and clinically relevant outcomes such as weight.
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherBMJ PUBLISHING GROUPen
dc.relation.urlhttp://drc.bmj.com/lookup/doi/10.1136/bmjdrc-2015-000183en
dc.rightsThis is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license. Copyright is held by the author(s) or the publisher. If your intended use exceeds the permitted uses specified by the license, contact the publisher for more information.en
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
dc.titleImproving performance in the detection and management of cystic fibrosis-related diabetes in the Mountain West Cystic Fibrosis Consortiumen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.contributor.departmentUniv Arizonaen
dc.identifier.journalBMJ Open Diabetes Research & Careen
dc.description.collectioninformationThis item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.en
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen
refterms.dateFOA2018-09-11T16:54:00Z
html.description.abstractObjective: Cystic fibrosis (CF)-related diabetes (CFRD) is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Improved detection and management may improve outcomes; however, actual practice falls short of published guidelines. We studied efforts to improve CFRD screening and management in the Mountain West CF Consortium (MWCFC). Research design and methods: This is a prospective observational cohort study evaluating quality improvement by accredited CF centers in Arizona, Colorado, New Mexico, and Utah performed between 2002 and 2008. After Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval, centers evaluated adherence with CF Foundation guidelines for CFRD. Each center developed and implemented quality improvement plans to improve both screening and management. Centers were reassessed 1 year later. Results: Initially, each CF center had low adherence with screening recommendations (26.5% of eligible patients) that did not improve during the study. However, patients with confirmed CFRD markedly increased (141 (12% of MWCFC patients) to 224 (17%), p<0.001), and with improved adherence to management guidelines, patients with CFRD had increased weight (56.8-58.9 kg, p<0.001), body mass index (21.1-21.4, p=0.003), and weight-for-age z-score (-1.42 to -0.84, p<0.001). Quality improvement methods were specific to the practice settings of each center but shared the common goal of adhering to CFRD care guidelines. 1 year after implementation, no center significantly differed from any other in level of adherence to guidelines. Conclusions: Improving adherence with CFRD care guidelines requires substantial effort and may be incompletely successful, particularly for CFRD screening, but the effort may significantly improve patient monitoring and clinically relevant outcomes such as weight.


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
e000183.full.pdf
Size:
559.4Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
FInal Published Version

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license. Copyright is held by the author(s) or the publisher. If your intended use exceeds the permitted uses specified by the license, contact the publisher for more information.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license. Copyright is held by the author(s) or the publisher. If your intended use exceeds the permitted uses specified by the license, contact the publisher for more information.