Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBandyopadhyay, R.
dc.contributor.authorOrtega-Beltran, A.
dc.contributor.authorAkande, A.
dc.contributor.authorMutegi, C.
dc.contributor.authorAtehnkeng, J.
dc.contributor.authorKaptoge, L.
dc.contributor.authorSenghor, A.L.
dc.contributor.authorAdhikari, B.N.
dc.contributor.authorCotty, P.J.
dc.date.accessioned2017-02-07T23:33:33Z
dc.date.available2017-02-07T23:33:33Z
dc.date.issued2016-11-02
dc.identifier.citationBiological control of aflatoxins in Africa: current status and potential challenges in the face of climate change 2016, 9 (5):771 World Mycotoxin Journalen
dc.identifier.issn1875-0710
dc.identifier.issn1875-0796
dc.identifier.doi10.3920/WMJ2016.2130
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/622460
dc.description.abstractAflatoxin contamination of crops is frequent in warm regions across the globe, including large areas in sub-Saharan Africa. Crop contamination with these dangerous toxins transcends health, food security, and trade sectors. It cuts across the value chain, affecting farmers, traders, markets, and finally consumers. Diverse fungi within Aspergillus section Flavi contaminate crops with aflatoxins. Within these Aspergillus communities, several genotypes are not capable of producing aflatoxins (atoxigenic). Carefully selected atoxigenic genotypes in biological control (biocontrol) formulations efficiently reduce aflatoxin contamination of crops when applied prior to flowering in the field. This safe and environmentally friendly, effective technology was pioneered in the US, where well over a million acres of susceptible crops are treated annually. The technology has been improved for use in sub-Saharan Africa, where efforts are under way to develop biocontrol products, under the trade name Aflasafe, for 11 African nations. The number of participating nations is expected to increase. In parallel, state of the art technology has been developed for large-scale inexpensive manufacture of Aflasafe products under the conditions present in many African nations. Results to date indicate that all Aflasafe products, registered and under experimental use, reduce aflatoxin concentrations in treated crops by > 80% in comparison to untreated crops in both field and storage conditions. Benefits of aflatoxin biocontrol technologies are discussed along with potential challenges, including climate change, likely to be faced during the scaling-up of Aflasafe products. Lastly, we respond to several apprehensions expressed in the literature about the use of atoxigenic genotypes in biocontrol formulations. These responses relate to the following apprehensions: sorghum as carrier, distribution costs, aflatoxin-conscious markets, efficacy during drought, post-harvest benefits, risk of allergies and/or aspergillosis, influence of Aflasafe on other mycotoxins and on soil microenvironment, dynamics of Aspergillus genotypes, and recombination between atoxigenic and toxigenic genotypes in natural conditions.
dc.description.sponsorshipBill & Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF); United States Agency for International Development (USAID); Bundesministerium fur wirtschaftliche Zusammenarbeit und Entwicklung (BMZ, German Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development); AgResults; MycoRed; CGIAR A4NH Research Program; CGIAR MAIZE Research Program; Meridian Institute on behalf of the Partnership for Aflatoxin Control in Africa (PACA); United States Department of Agriculture - Foreign Agricultural Service; Austrian Development Cooperation; Commercial Agriculture Development Program of the Government of Nigeriaen
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherWAGENINGEN ACADEMIC PUBLISHERSen
dc.relation.urlhttp://www.wageningenacademic.com/doi/10.3920/WMJ2016.2130en
dc.rights© 2016 Wageningen Academic Publishersen
dc.subjectatoxigenicen
dc.subjectmaizeen
dc.subjectgroundnuten
dc.subjectAflasafeen
dc.subjectcommercialisationen
dc.titleBiological control of aflatoxins in Africa: current status and potential challenges in the face of climate changeen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.contributor.departmentUSDA-ARS, School of Plant Sciences, University of Arizonaen
dc.identifier.journalWorld Mycotoxin Journalen
dc.description.notePublished Open Access.en
dc.description.collectioninformationThis item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.en
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen
refterms.dateFOA2018-06-12T07:12:47Z
html.description.abstractAflatoxin contamination of crops is frequent in warm regions across the globe, including large areas in sub-Saharan Africa. Crop contamination with these dangerous toxins transcends health, food security, and trade sectors. It cuts across the value chain, affecting farmers, traders, markets, and finally consumers. Diverse fungi within Aspergillus section Flavi contaminate crops with aflatoxins. Within these Aspergillus communities, several genotypes are not capable of producing aflatoxins (atoxigenic). Carefully selected atoxigenic genotypes in biological control (biocontrol) formulations efficiently reduce aflatoxin contamination of crops when applied prior to flowering in the field. This safe and environmentally friendly, effective technology was pioneered in the US, where well over a million acres of susceptible crops are treated annually. The technology has been improved for use in sub-Saharan Africa, where efforts are under way to develop biocontrol products, under the trade name Aflasafe, for 11 African nations. The number of participating nations is expected to increase. In parallel, state of the art technology has been developed for large-scale inexpensive manufacture of Aflasafe products under the conditions present in many African nations. Results to date indicate that all Aflasafe products, registered and under experimental use, reduce aflatoxin concentrations in treated crops by > 80% in comparison to untreated crops in both field and storage conditions. Benefits of aflatoxin biocontrol technologies are discussed along with potential challenges, including climate change, likely to be faced during the scaling-up of Aflasafe products. Lastly, we respond to several apprehensions expressed in the literature about the use of atoxigenic genotypes in biocontrol formulations. These responses relate to the following apprehensions: sorghum as carrier, distribution costs, aflatoxin-conscious markets, efficacy during drought, post-harvest benefits, risk of allergies and/or aspergillosis, influence of Aflasafe on other mycotoxins and on soil microenvironment, dynamics of Aspergillus genotypes, and recombination between atoxigenic and toxigenic genotypes in natural conditions.


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Aflatoxins_WMJ2016.2130.pdf
Size:
1.966Mb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Final Published Version

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record