Assessing The Importance Of Past Human Behavior In Dendroarchaeological Research: Examples From Range Creek Canyon, Utah, U.S.A.
dc.contributor.author | Towner, Ronald H. | |
dc.contributor.author | Salzer, Matthew W. | |
dc.contributor.author | Parks, James A. | |
dc.contributor.author | Barlow, K. Renee | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-02-17T19:10:07Z | |
dc.date.available | 2017-02-17T19:10:07Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2009-07 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Towner, R.H., Salzer, M.W., Parks, J.A., Barlow, K.R., 2009. Assessing the importance of past human behavior in dendroarchaeological research: Examples from Range Creek Canyon, Utah, U.S.A. Tree-Ring Research 65(2):117-128. | en |
dc.identifier.issn | 2162-4585 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1536-1098 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10150/622611 | |
dc.description.abstract | Dendroarchaeological samples can contain three kinds of information: chronological, behavioral, and environmental. The decisions of past people regarding species selection, beam size, procurement and modification techniques, deadwood use, and stockpiling are the most critical factors influencing an archaeological date distribution. Using dendrochronological samples from prehistoric and historic period sites in the same area of eastern Utah, this paper examines past human behavior as the critical factor in dendroarchaeological date distributions. | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en |
dc.publisher | Tree-Ring Society | en |
dc.relation.url | http://www.treeringsociety.org | en |
dc.rights | Copyright © Tree-Ring Society. All rights reserved. | en |
dc.subject | Dendrochronology | en |
dc.subject | Tree Rings | en |
dc.subject | Dendroarchaeology | en |
dc.subject | Past Human Behavior | en |
dc.subject | Species Selection | en |
dc.subject | Beam Selection | en |
dc.subject | Range Creek Canyon | en |
dc.subject | Utah | en |
dc.subject | Fremont Culture | en |
dc.title | Assessing The Importance Of Past Human Behavior In Dendroarchaeological Research: Examples From Range Creek Canyon, Utah, U.S.A. | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en |
dc.type | text | en |
dc.contributor.department | Laboratory of Tree-Ring Research, University of Arizona | en |
dc.contributor.department | College of Eastern Utah | en |
dc.identifier.journal | Tree-Ring Research | en |
dc.description.collectioninformation | This item is part of the Tree-Ring Research (formerly Tree-Ring Bulletin) archive. For more information about this peer-reviewed scholarly journal, please email the Editor of Tree-Ring Research at editor@treeringsociety.org. | en |
refterms.dateFOA | 2018-09-11T17:41:18Z | |
html.description.abstract | Dendroarchaeological samples can contain three kinds of information: chronological, behavioral, and environmental. The decisions of past people regarding species selection, beam size, procurement and modification techniques, deadwood use, and stockpiling are the most critical factors influencing an archaeological date distribution. Using dendrochronological samples from prehistoric and historic period sites in the same area of eastern Utah, this paper examines past human behavior as the critical factor in dendroarchaeological date distributions. |