Advance care planning in patients with incurable cancer: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
Author
Johnson, StephanieClayton, Josephine
Butow, Phyllis N
Silvester, William
Detering, Karen
Hall, Jane
Kiely, Belinda E
Cebon, Jonathon
Clarke, Stephen
Bell, Melanie L
Stockler, Martin
Beale, Phillip
Tattersall, Martin H N
Affiliation
Univ Arizona, Mel & Enid Zuckerman Coll Publ HlthIssue Date
2016-12-01
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
BMJ PUBLISHING GROUPCitation
Advance care planning in patients with incurable cancer: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial 2016, 6 (12):e012387 BMJ OpenJournal
BMJ OpenRights
Copyright © The Author(s). Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
Introduction: There is limited evidence documenting the effectiveness of Advance Care Planning (ACP) in cancer care. The present randomised trial is designed to evaluate whether the administration of formal ACP improves compliance with patients' end-of-life (EOL) wishes and patient and family satisfaction with care. Methods and analysis: A randomised control trial in eight oncology centres across New South Wales and Victoria, Australia, is designed to assess the efficacy of a formal ACP intervention for patients with cancer. Patients with incurable cancer and an expected survival of 3-12 months, plus a nominated family member or friend will be randomised to receive either standard care or standard care plus a formal ACP intervention. The project sample size is 210 patient-family/friend dyads. The primary outcome measure is family/friend-reported: (1) discussion with the patient about their EOL wishes and (2) perception that the patient's EOL wishes were met. Secondary outcome measures include: documentation of and compliance with patient preferences for medical intervention at the EOL; the family/friend's perception of the quality of the patient's EOL care; the impact of death on surviving family; patient-family and patient-healthcare provider communication about EOL care; patient and family/ friend satisfaction with care; quality of life of patient and family/friend subsequent to trial entry, the patient's strength of preferences for quality of life and length of life; the costs of care subsequent to trial entry and place of death. Ethics and dissemination: Ethical approval was received from the Sydney Local Health District (RPA Zone) Human Research Ethical Committee, Australia (Protocol number X13-0064). Study results will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals and presented at national and international conferences.Note
Open access journal.ISSN
2044-60552044-6055
Version
Final published versionSponsors
National Health and Medical Research Council [APP1050596]Additional Links
http://bmjopen.bmj.com/lookup/doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012387ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012387
Scopus Count
Collections
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Copyright © The Author(s). Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license.

