Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWehr, Richard
dc.contributor.authorSaleska, Scott R.
dc.date.accessioned2017-03-11T00:57:07Z
dc.date.available2017-03-11T00:57:07Z
dc.date.issued2017-01-03
dc.identifier.citationThe long-solved problem of the best-fit straight line: application to isotopic mixing lines 2017, 14 (1):17 Biogeosciencesen
dc.identifier.issn1726-4189
dc.identifier.doi10.5194/bg-14-17-2017
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/622813
dc.description.abstractIt has been almost 50 years since York published an exact and general solution for the best-fit straight line to independent points with normally distributed errors in both x and y. York's solution is highly cited in the geophysical literature but almost unknown outside of it, so that there has been no ebb in the tide of books and papers wrestling with the problem. Much of the post-1969 literature on straight-line fitting has sown confusion not merely by its content but by its very existence. The optimal least-squares fit is already known; the problem is already solved. Here we introduce the non-specialist reader to York's solution and demonstrate its application in the interesting case of the isotopic mixing line, an analytical tool widely used to determine the isotopic signature of trace gas sources for the study of biogeochemical cycles. The most commonly known linear regression methods – ordinary least-squares regression (OLS), geometric mean regression (GMR), and orthogonal distance regression (ODR) – have each been recommended as the best method for fitting isotopic mixing lines. In fact, OLS, GMR, and ODR are all special cases of York's solution that are valid only under particular measurement conditions, and those conditions do not hold in general for isotopic mixing lines. Using Monte Carlo simulations, we quantify the biases in OLS, GMR, and ODR under various conditions and show that York's general – and convenient – solution is always the least biased.
dc.description.sponsorshipUS Department Of Energy, Office of Science, Terrestrial Ecosystem Science program [DE-SC0006741]; National Science Foundation Macrosystems Biology program [1241962]; Agnese Nelms Haury Program in Environment and Social Justice at the University of Arizonaen
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherCOPERNICUS GESELLSCHAFT MBHen
dc.relation.urlhttp://www.biogeosciences.net/14/17/2017/en
dc.rights© Author(s) 2017. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.en
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/
dc.titleThe long-solved problem of the best-fit straight line: application to isotopic mixing linesen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.contributor.departmentUniv Arizona, Dept Ecol & Evolutionary Biolen
dc.identifier.journalBiogeosciencesen
dc.description.collectioninformationThis item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.en
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen
refterms.dateFOA2018-04-25T18:24:48Z
html.description.abstractIt has been almost 50 years since York published an exact and general solution for the best-fit straight line to independent points with normally distributed errors in both <i>x</i> and <i>y</i>. York's solution is highly cited in the geophysical literature but almost unknown outside of it, so that there has been no ebb in the tide of books and papers wrestling with the problem. Much of the post-1969 literature on straight-line fitting has sown confusion not merely by its content but by its very existence. The optimal least-squares fit is already known; the problem is already solved. Here we introduce the non-specialist reader to York's solution and demonstrate its application in the interesting case of the isotopic mixing line, an analytical tool widely used to determine the isotopic signature of trace gas sources for the study of biogeochemical cycles. The most commonly known linear regression methods – ordinary least-squares regression (OLS), geometric mean regression (GMR), and orthogonal distance regression (ODR) – have each been recommended as the best method for fitting isotopic mixing lines. In fact, OLS, GMR, and ODR are all special cases of York's solution that are valid only under particular measurement conditions, and those conditions do not hold in general for isotopic mixing lines. Using Monte Carlo simulations, we quantify the biases in OLS, GMR, and ODR under various conditions and show that York's general – and convenient – solution is always the least biased.


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
bg-14-17-2017.pdf
Size:
369.2Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
FInal Published Version

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© Author(s) 2017. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © Author(s) 2017. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.