Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBleicher, Sonny S.
dc.contributor.authorBrown, Joel S.
dc.contributor.authorEmbar, Keren
dc.contributor.authorKotler, Burt P.
dc.date.accessioned2017-03-14T17:04:02Z
dc.date.available2017-03-14T17:04:02Z
dc.date.issued2016-05-13
dc.identifier.citationNovel predator recognition by Allenby's gerbil (Gerbillus andersoni allenbyi): do gerbils learn to respond to a snake that can “see” in the dark? 2016, 62 (3-4):178 Israel Journal of Ecology & Evolutionen
dc.identifier.issn1565-9801
dc.identifier.issn2224-4662
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/15659801.2016.1176614
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/622826
dc.description.abstractUnlike desert rodents from North America, Allenby’s gerbil (Gerbillus andersoni allenbyi) from the Negev Desert, Israel has evolved with snakes that do not have heat-sensitive sensory pits that enhance night vision. Does this history affect their ability to assess and respond to a snake that has this ability? As a test, we exposed gerbils to risk of predation from various predators, including snakes, owls, and foxes. The snakes included the Saharan horned viper (Cerastes cerastes) and the sidewinder rattlesnake (Crotalus cerastes). The former snake lacks sensory pits and shares a common evolutionary history with the gerbil. The latter snake, while convergent evolutionarily on the horned viper, has sensory pits and no prior history with the gerbil. The gerbils exploited depletable resource patches similarly, regardless of snake species and moon phase. While the gerbils did not respond to the novel snake as a greater threat than their familiar horned viper, the gerbils were cognizant that the novel predator was a threat. In response to both snakes, giving-up densities (GUDs; the amount of food left in a resource patch following exploitation) of the gerbils were higher in the bush than open microhabitat. In response to moonlight, GUDs were higher on full than on the new moon. Based on GUDs, the gerbils responded most to the risk of predation from the red fox, least from the two snake species, and intermediate for the barn owl. Keywords:
dc.description.sponsorshipUS-Israel Binational Science Foundation (BSF) [BSF-2008163]en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherTAYLOR & FRANCIS LTDen
dc.relation.urlhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/15659801.2016.1176614en
dc.rights© 2016 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.en
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
dc.subjectGerbilsen
dc.subjectPredator-Prey Interactionsen
dc.subjectForaging Gamesen
dc.subjectConstraint-breaking adaptationsen
dc.subjectvipersen
dc.subjectconvergent evolutionen
dc.subjectbiological invasionsen
dc.subjectcommon-garden experimentsen
dc.subjectprey naiveteen
dc.titleNovel predator recognition by Allenby's gerbil (Gerbillus andersoni allenbyi ): do gerbils learn to respond to a snake that can “see” in the dark?en
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.journalIsrael Journal of Ecology & Evolutionen
dc.description.note12 month embargo; Published online: 13 May 2016en
dc.description.collectioninformationThis item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.en
dc.eprint.versionFinal accepted manuscripten
refterms.dateFOA2017-05-14T00:00:00Z
html.description.abstractUnlike desert rodents from North America, Allenby’s gerbil (Gerbillus andersoni allenbyi) from the Negev Desert, Israel has evolved with snakes that do not have heat-sensitive sensory pits that enhance night vision. Does this history affect their ability to assess and respond to a snake that has this ability? As a test, we exposed gerbils to risk of predation from various predators, including snakes, owls, and foxes. The snakes included the Saharan horned viper (Cerastes cerastes) and the sidewinder rattlesnake (Crotalus cerastes). The former snake lacks sensory pits and shares a common evolutionary history with the gerbil. The latter snake, while convergent evolutionarily on the horned viper, has sensory pits and no prior history with the gerbil. The gerbils exploited depletable resource patches similarly, regardless of snake species and moon phase. While the gerbils did not respond to the novel snake as a greater threat than their familiar horned viper, the gerbils were cognizant that the novel predator was a threat. In response to both snakes, giving-up densities (GUDs; the amount of food left in a resource patch following exploitation) of the gerbils were higher in the bush than open microhabitat. In response to moonlight, GUDs were higher on full than on the new moon. Based on GUDs, the gerbils responded most to the risk of predation from the red fox, least from the two snake species, and intermediate for the barn owl. Keywords:


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Bleicher et al IJEE post acceptance ...
Size:
459.6Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Final Accepted Manuscript
Thumbnail
Name:
figs file.pdf
Size:
429.5Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
figures

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record