Massive stars dying alone: the extremely remote environment of SN 2009ip
Affiliation
Univ Arizona, Steward ObservIssue Date
2016-12-11Keywords
circumstellar matterstars: evolution
supernovae: general
supernovae: individual: 2009ip
stars: winds, outflows
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
OXFORD UNIV PRESSCitation
Massive stars dying alone: the extremely remote environment of SN 2009ip 2016, 463 (3):2904 Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical SocietyRights
© 2016 The Authors. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Royal Astronomical Society.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
We present late-time Hubble Space Telescope (HST) images of the site of supernova (SN) 2009ip taken almost 3 yr after its bright 2012 luminosity peak. SN 2009ip is now slightly fainter in broad filters than the progenitor candidate detected by HST in 1999. The current source continues to be dominated by ongoing late-time circumstellar material interaction that produces strong Ha emission and a weak pseudo-continuum, as found previously for 1-2 yr after explosion. The intent of these observations was to search for evidence of recent star formation in the local (similar to 1 kpc; 10 arcsec) environment around SN 2009ip, in the remote outskirts of its host spiral galaxy NGC 7259. We can rule out the presence of any massive star-forming complexes like 30 Dor or the Carina nebula at the SN site or within a few kpc. If the progenitor of SN 2009ip was really a 50-80 M-circle dot star as archival HST images suggested, then it is strange that there is no sign of this type of massive star formation anywhere in the vicinity. A possible explanation is that the progenitor was the product of a merger or binary mass transfer, rejuvenated after a lifetime that was much longer than 4-5 Myr, allowing its natal H II region to have faded. A smaller region like the Orion nebula would be an unresolved but easily detected point source. This is ruled out within similar to 1.5 kpc around SN 2009ip, but a small H II region could be hiding in the glare of SN 2009ip itself. Later images after a few more years have passed are needed to confirm that the progenitor candidate is truly gone and to test for the possibility of a small H II region or cluster at the SN position.ISSN
0035-87111365-2966
Version
Final published versionSponsors
National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) through HST from the Space Telescope Science Institute [GO-13787]; NASA [NAS5-26555]; National Science Foundation (NSF) [AST-1210599, AST-1312221]; National Science Foundationae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1093/mnras/stw2190
