• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • UA Faculty Research
    • UA Faculty Publications
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • UA Faculty Research
    • UA Faculty Publications
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of UA Campus RepositoryCommunitiesTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsPublisherJournalThis CollectionTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsPublisherJournal

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    About

    AboutUA Faculty PublicationsUA DissertationsUA Master's ThesesUA Honors ThesesUA PressUA YearbooksUA CatalogsUA Libraries

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    Technique Standards for Skin Lesion Imaging

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Thumbnail
    Name:
    jamadermatology_Katragadda_201 ...
    Size:
    209.5Kb
    Format:
    PDF
    Description:
    Final Published Version
    Download
    Author
    Katragadda, Chinmayee
    Finnane, Anna
    Soyer, H. Peter
    Marghoob, Ashfaq A.
    Halpern, Allan
    Malvehy, Josep
    Kittler, Harald
    Hofmann-Wellenhof, Rainer
    Da Silva, Dennis
    Abraham, Ivo
    Curiel-Lewandrowski, Clara
    Show allShow less
    Affiliation
    Univ Arizona, Ctr Hlth Outcomes & Pharmacoecon Res
    Univ Arizona, Ctr Canc
    Univ Arizona, Dept Dermatol
    Issue Date
    2017-02-01
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Publisher
    AMER MEDICAL ASSOC
    Citation
    Technique Standards for Skin Lesion Imaging 2017, 153 (2):207 JAMA Dermatology
    Journal
    JAMA Dermatology
    Rights
    © 2017, American Medical Association.
    Collection Information
    This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.
    Abstract
    IMPORTANCE Variability in the metrics for image acquisition at the total body, regional, close-up, and dermoscopic levels impacts the quality and generalizability of skin images. Consensus guidelines are indicated to achieve universal imaging standards in dermatology. OBJECTIVE To achieve consensus among members of the International Skin Imaging Collaboration (ISIC) on standards for image acquisition metrics using a hybrid Delphi method. EVIDENCE REVIEW Delphi study with 5 rounds of ratings and revisions until relative consensus was achieved. The initial set of statements was developed by a core group (CG) on the basis of a literature review and clinical experience followed by 2 rounds of rating and revisions. The consensus process was validated by an extended group (EG) of ISIC members through 2 rounds of scoring and revisions. In all rounds, respondents rated the draft recommendations on a 1 (strongly agree) to 5 (strongly disagree) scale, explained ratings of less than 5, and optionally provided comments. At any stage, a recommendation was retained if both mean and median rating was 4 or higher. RESULTS The initial set of 45 items (round 1) was expanded by the CG to 56 variants in round 2, subsequently reduced to 42 items scored by the EG in round 3, yielding an EG set of 33 recommendations (rounds 4 and 5): general recommendation (1 guideline), lighting (5), background color (3), field of view (3), image orientation (8), focus/depth of field (3), resolution (4), scale (3), color calibration (2), and image storage (1). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE This iterative process of ratings and comments yielded a strong consensus on standards for skin imaging in dermatology practice. Adoption of these methods for image standardization is likely to improve clinical practice, information exchange, electronic health record documentation, harmonization of clinical studies and database development, and clinical decision support. Feasibility and validity testing under real-world clinical conditions is indicated.
    Note
    12 month embargo; Published Online: November 23, 2016.
    ISSN
    2168-6068
    DOI
    10.1001/jamadermatol.2016.3949
    Version
    Final published version
    Additional Links
    http://archderm.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?doi=10.1001/jamadermatol.2016.3949
    ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
    10.1001/jamadermatol.2016.3949
    Scopus Count
    Collections
    UA Faculty Publications

    entitlement

     
    The University of Arizona Libraries | 1510 E. University Blvd. | Tucson, AZ 85721-0055
    Tel 520-621-6442 | repository@u.library.arizona.edu
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2017  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.