Using satellite-based evapotranspiration estimates to improve the structure of a simple conceptual rainfall–runoff model
dc.contributor.author | Roy, Tirthankar | |
dc.contributor.author | Gupta, Hoshin V. | |
dc.contributor.author | Serrat-Capdevila, Aleix | |
dc.contributor.author | Valdes, Juan B. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-04-24T21:17:54Z | |
dc.date.available | 2017-04-24T21:17:54Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2017-02-14 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Using satellite-based evapotranspiration estimates to improve the structure of a simple conceptual rainfall–runoff model 2017, 21 (2):879 Hydrology and Earth System Sciences | en |
dc.identifier.issn | 1607-7938 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.5194/hess-21-879-2017 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10150/623239 | |
dc.description.abstract | Daily, quasi-global (50° N–S and 180° W–E), satellite-based estimates of actual evapotranspiration at 0.25° spatial resolution have recently become available, generated by the Global Land Evaporation Amsterdam Model (GLEAM). We investigate the use of these data to improve the performance of a simple lumped catchment-scale hydrologic model driven by satellite-based precipitation estimates to generate streamflow simulations for a poorly gauged basin in Africa. In one approach, we use GLEAM to constrain the evapotranspiration estimates generated by the model, thereby modifying daily water balance and improving model performance. In an alternative approach, we instead change the structure of the model to improve its ability to simulate actual evapotranspiration (as estimated by GLEAM). Finally, we test whether the GLEAM product is able to further improve the performance of the structurally modified model. Results indicate that while both approaches can provide improved simulations of streamflow, the second approach also improves the simulation of actual evapotranspiration significantly, which substantiates the importance of making diagnostic structural improvements to hydrologic models whenever possible. | |
dc.description.sponsorship | NASAUSAID SERVIR program [11-SERVIR11-58]; Australian Centre of Excellence for Climate System Science [CE110001028]; EU [INCO-20011-7.6, 294947] | en |
dc.language.iso | en | en |
dc.publisher | COPERNICUS GESELLSCHAFT MBH | en |
dc.relation.url | http://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/21/879/2017/ | en |
dc.rights | © Author(s) 2017. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. | en |
dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ | |
dc.title | Using satellite-based evapotranspiration estimates to improve the structure of a simple conceptual rainfall–runoff model | en |
dc.type | Article | en |
dc.contributor.department | Univ Arizona, Dept Hydrol & Atmospher Sci | en |
dc.identifier.journal | Hydrology and Earth System Sciences | en |
dc.description.note | Open Access Journal. | en |
dc.description.collectioninformation | This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu. | en |
dc.eprint.version | Final published version | en |
refterms.dateFOA | 2018-06-14T09:28:13Z | |
html.description.abstract | Daily, quasi-global (50° N–S and 180° W–E), satellite-based estimates of actual evapotranspiration at 0.25° spatial resolution have recently become available, generated by the Global Land Evaporation Amsterdam Model (GLEAM). We investigate the use of these data to improve the performance of a simple lumped catchment-scale hydrologic model driven by satellite-based precipitation estimates to generate streamflow simulations for a poorly gauged basin in Africa. In one approach, we use GLEAM to constrain the evapotranspiration estimates generated by the model, thereby modifying daily water balance and improving model performance. In an alternative approach, we instead change the structure of the model to improve its ability to simulate actual evapotranspiration (as estimated by GLEAM). Finally, we test whether the GLEAM product is able to further improve the performance of the structurally modified model. Results indicate that while both approaches can provide improved simulations of streamflow, the second approach also improves the simulation of actual evapotranspiration significantly, which substantiates the importance of making <q>diagnostic structural improvements</q> to hydrologic models whenever possible. |