Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorStarobinska, Ella
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-19T20:07:27Z
dc.date.available2017-05-19T20:07:27Z
dc.date.issued2017-05-19
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/623542
dc.descriptionA Thesis submitted to The University of Arizona College of Medicine - Phoenix in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Medicine.en
dc.description.abstractThe role of viruses in most common cancers is undoubtedly important, yet highly underestimated. Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) has been implicated with 99.7% of cervical cancers and its oncogenic mechanism has been clearly identified. The association of cervical cancer with 90% of triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) cases in African countries creates an intriguing possibility of HPV being a candidate oncovirus for breast cancer. In fact, numerous recent tissue studies conducted throughout the world detected HPV DNA in breast cancer tissues of patients with cervical cancer, while high‐risk HPV types (16, 18, 33) were present in invasive ductal carcinomas. 5,6 Prevalence of HPV varied from 4% in Mexican to 86% in American women. The virus was noted to be present in tumor tissue only, with the exception of one study, which identified lower concentration of HPV in normal tissue. 7 Although substantial evidence exists supporting involvement of HPV in breast cancer, no clinical studies have been conducted to elucidate this relationship. The goal of our retrospective chart review was to examine the association of breast cancer and HPV‐related cervical dysplasia in a cohort of women in urban setting. 15% (39/260) had abnormal Pap‐smear, while 8% (16/198) were HPVpositive. No statistically significant difference of Pap‐smear abnormality or of HPV positivity were detected among the groups in all categories. However, we noticed that non‐luminal breast cancers, double negative and triple negative (DN and TN), have higher rate of HPV positivity: 13.3% non‐luminal vs. 6.3% of luminal breast cancers, 12.5% DN breast cancers and 11.5% of TN vs. 6.4% of luminal A and 6.3% of luminal B. This creates an intriguing possibility that HPV might be associated with more than 50% increase of incidence rates of non‐luminal breast cancers, suggesting a need for larger scale studies to confirm this association.
dc.language.isoen_USen
dc.publisherThe University of Arizona.en_US
dc.rightsCopyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the College of Medicine - Phoenix, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author.en_US
dc.subjectHuman Papilloma Virus (HPV)en
dc.subject.meshPapillomaviridaeen
dc.subject.meshTriple Negative Breast Neoplasmsen
dc.subject.meshWomenen
dc.subject.meshCohort Studiesen
dc.subject.meshBreast Neoplasmsen
dc.subject.meshUrban Populationen
dc.subject.meshPapillomavirus Infectionsen
dc.subject.meshRetrospective Studiesen
dc.titleIs HPV a Culprit For Breast Carcinoma? A Retrospective Studyen_US
dc.typetext; Electronic Thesisen
dc.contributor.departmentThe University of Arizona College of Medicine - Phoenixen
dc.description.collectioninformationThis item is part of the College of Medicine - Phoenix Scholarly Projects 2017 collection. For more information, contact the Phoenix Biomedical Campus Library at pbc-library@email.arizona.edu.en_US
dc.contributor.mentorMehta, Divyeshen
refterms.dateFOA2018-06-19T10:09:00Z
html.description.abstractThe role of viruses in most common cancers is undoubtedly important, yet highly underestimated. Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) has been implicated with 99.7% of cervical cancers and its oncogenic mechanism has been clearly identified. The association of cervical cancer with 90% of triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) cases in African countries creates an intriguing possibility of HPV being a candidate oncovirus for breast cancer. In fact, numerous recent tissue studies conducted throughout the world detected HPV DNA in breast cancer tissues of patients with cervical cancer, while high‐risk HPV types (16, 18, 33) were present in invasive ductal carcinomas. 5,6 Prevalence of HPV varied from 4% in Mexican to 86% in American women. The virus was noted to be present in tumor tissue only, with the exception of one study, which identified lower concentration of HPV in normal tissue. 7 Although substantial evidence exists supporting involvement of HPV in breast cancer, no clinical studies have been conducted to elucidate this relationship. The goal of our retrospective chart review was to examine the association of breast cancer and HPV‐related cervical dysplasia in a cohort of women in urban setting. 15% (39/260) had abnormal Pap‐smear, while 8% (16/198) were HPVpositive. No statistically significant difference of Pap‐smear abnormality or of HPV positivity were detected among the groups in all categories. However, we noticed that non‐luminal breast cancers, double negative and triple negative (DN and TN), have higher rate of HPV positivity: 13.3% non‐luminal vs. 6.3% of luminal breast cancers, 12.5% DN breast cancers and 11.5% of TN vs. 6.4% of luminal A and 6.3% of luminal B. This creates an intriguing possibility that HPV might be associated with more than 50% increase of incidence rates of non‐luminal breast cancers, suggesting a need for larger scale studies to confirm this association.


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
StarobinskaE Poster.pdf
Size:
86.97Kb
Format:
PDF
Thumbnail
Name:
StarobinskaE Thesis.pdf
Size:
191.0Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record