Name:
Batiste_2017_ApJL_838_L10.pdf
Size:
496.4Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
FInal Published Version
Author
Batiste, Merida
Bentz, Misty C.

Raimundo, Sandra I.

Vestergaard, Marianne

Onken, Christopher A.

Affiliation
Univ Arizona, Steward ObservIssue Date
2017-03-24
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
IOP PUBLISHING LTDCitation
Recalibration of the MBH–σ⋆ Relation for AGN 2017, 838 (1):L10 The Astrophysical JournalRights
© 2017. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
We present a recalibration of the M-BH-sigma(star) relation, based on a sample of 16 reverberation-mapped galaxies with newly determined bulge stellar velocity dispersions (sigma(star)) from integral-field spectroscopy (IFS), and a sample of 32 quiescent galaxies with publicly available IFS. For both samples, sigma(star) is determined via two different methods that are popular in the literature, and we provide fits for each sample based on both sets of sigma(star). We find the fit to the active galactic nucleus sample is shallower than the fit to the quiescent galaxy sample, and that the slopes for each sample are in agreement with previous investigations. However, the intercepts to the quiescent galaxy relations are notably higher than those found in previous studies, due to the systematically lower sigma(star) measurements that we obtain from IFS. We find that this may be driven, in part, by poorly constrained measurements of bulge effective radius (r(e)) for the quiescent galaxy sample, which may bias the sigma(star) measurements low. We use these quiescent galaxy parameterizations, as well as one from the literature, to recalculate the virial scaling factor f. We assess the potential biases in each measurement, and suggest f = 4.82 +/- 1.67 as the best currently available estimate. However, we caution that the details of how sigma(star) is measured can significantly affect f, and there is still much room for improvement.ISSN
2041-8213Version
Final published versionSponsors
NSF through CAREER [AST-1253702]; Danish Council for Independent Research [DFF 4002-00275]Additional Links
http://stacks.iop.org/2041-8205/838/i=1/a=L10?key=crossref.6e3e8a73fe9962a2637f2b7c82206091ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.3847/2041-8213/aa6571