Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBatiste, Merida
dc.contributor.authorBentz, Misty C.
dc.contributor.authorRaimundo, Sandra I.
dc.contributor.authorVestergaard, Marianne
dc.contributor.authorOnken, Christopher A.
dc.date.accessioned2017-06-02T21:27:12Z
dc.date.available2017-06-02T21:27:12Z
dc.date.issued2017-03-24
dc.identifier.citationRecalibration of the MBH–σ⋆ Relation for AGN 2017, 838 (1):L10 The Astrophysical Journalen
dc.identifier.issn2041-8213
dc.identifier.doi10.3847/2041-8213/aa6571
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/623860
dc.description.abstractWe present a recalibration of the M-BH-sigma(star) relation, based on a sample of 16 reverberation-mapped galaxies with newly determined bulge stellar velocity dispersions (sigma(star)) from integral-field spectroscopy (IFS), and a sample of 32 quiescent galaxies with publicly available IFS. For both samples, sigma(star) is determined via two different methods that are popular in the literature, and we provide fits for each sample based on both sets of sigma(star). We find the fit to the active galactic nucleus sample is shallower than the fit to the quiescent galaxy sample, and that the slopes for each sample are in agreement with previous investigations. However, the intercepts to the quiescent galaxy relations are notably higher than those found in previous studies, due to the systematically lower sigma(star) measurements that we obtain from IFS. We find that this may be driven, in part, by poorly constrained measurements of bulge effective radius (r(e)) for the quiescent galaxy sample, which may bias the sigma(star) measurements low. We use these quiescent galaxy parameterizations, as well as one from the literature, to recalculate the virial scaling factor f. We assess the potential biases in each measurement, and suggest f = 4.82 +/- 1.67 as the best currently available estimate. However, we caution that the details of how sigma(star) is measured can significantly affect f, and there is still much room for improvement.
dc.description.sponsorshipNSF through CAREER [AST-1253702]; Danish Council for Independent Research [DFF 4002-00275]en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherIOP PUBLISHING LTDen
dc.relation.urlhttp://stacks.iop.org/2041-8205/838/i=1/a=L10?key=crossref.6e3e8a73fe9962a2637f2b7c82206091en
dc.rights© 2017. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved.en
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
dc.subjectgalaxies: activeen
dc.subjectgalaxies: bulgesen
dc.subjectgalaxies: kinematics and dynamicsen
dc.titleRecalibration of the MBH–σ⋆ Relation for AGNen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.contributor.departmentUniv Arizona, Steward Observen
dc.identifier.journalThe Astrophysical Journal Lettersen
dc.description.collectioninformationThis item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.en
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen
refterms.dateFOA2018-09-11T19:51:30Z
html.description.abstractWe present a recalibration of the M-BH-sigma(star) relation, based on a sample of 16 reverberation-mapped galaxies with newly determined bulge stellar velocity dispersions (sigma(star)) from integral-field spectroscopy (IFS), and a sample of 32 quiescent galaxies with publicly available IFS. For both samples, sigma(star) is determined via two different methods that are popular in the literature, and we provide fits for each sample based on both sets of sigma(star). We find the fit to the active galactic nucleus sample is shallower than the fit to the quiescent galaxy sample, and that the slopes for each sample are in agreement with previous investigations. However, the intercepts to the quiescent galaxy relations are notably higher than those found in previous studies, due to the systematically lower sigma(star) measurements that we obtain from IFS. We find that this may be driven, in part, by poorly constrained measurements of bulge effective radius (r(e)) for the quiescent galaxy sample, which may bias the sigma(star) measurements low. We use these quiescent galaxy parameterizations, as well as one from the literature, to recalculate the virial scaling factor f. We assess the potential biases in each measurement, and suggest f = 4.82 +/- 1.67 as the best currently available estimate. However, we caution that the details of how sigma(star) is measured can significantly affect f, and there is still much room for improvement.


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Batiste_2017_ApJL_838_L10.pdf
Size:
496.4Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
FInal Published Version

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record