Comparison of vision through surface modulated and spatial light modulated multifocal optics
Author
Vinas, MariaDorronsoro, Carlos
Radhakrishnan, Aiswaryah
Benedi-Garcia, Clara
LaVilla, Edward Anthony
Schwiegerling, Jim
Marcos, Susana
Affiliation
Univ Arizona, Coll Opt SciIssue Date
2017-03-03
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
OPTICAL SOC AMERCitation
Comparison of vision through surface modulated and spatial light modulated multifocal optics 2017, 8 (4):2055 Biomedical Optics ExpressJournal
Biomedical Optics ExpressRights
© 2017 Optical Society of America.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
Spatial-light-modulators (SLM) are increasingly used as active elements in adaptive optics (AO) systems to simulate optical corrections, in particular multifocal presbyopic corrections. In this study, we compared vision with lathe-manufactured multi-zone (2-4) multifocal, angularly and radially, segmented surfaces and through the same corrections simulated with a SLM in a custom-developed two-active-element AO visual simulator. We found that perceived visual quality measured through real manufactured surfaces and SLM-simulated phase maps corresponded highly. Optical simulations predicted differences in perceived visual quality across different designs at Far distance, but showed some discrepancies at intermediate and near. (C) 2017 Optical Society of AmericaNote
Open access journal.ISSN
2156-70852156-7085
Version
Final published versionSponsors
European Research Council [ERC-2011-AdG-294099]; Spanish Government grants [FIS2014-56643-R]; CSIC JAE Predoctoral Programs & MICINN FPU Predoctoral fellowshipAdditional Links
https://www.osapublishing.org/abstract.cfm?URI=boe-8-4-2055ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1364/BOE.8.002055