Name:
journal.pone.0175933.pdf
Size:
4.590Mb
Format:
PDF
Description:
FInal Published Version
Author
Carroll, Mark J.Brown, Nicholas
Goodall, Craig
Downs, Alexandra M.
Sheenan, Timothy H.
Anderson, Kirk E.
Affiliation
Univ Arizona, Dept EntomolUniv Arizona, Ctr Insect Sci
Univ Arizona, Coll Med
Issue Date
2017-04-21
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCECitation
Honey bees preferentially consume freshly-stored pollen 2017, 12 (4):e0175933 PLOS ONEJournal
PLOS ONERights
This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
Honey bees (Apis mellifera) collect and store both honey and pollen in preserved forms. Pollen storage involves the addition of honey or nectar and oral secretions to pollen granules. It is controversial whether the duration of pollen storage alters the palatability or nutritive value of the pollen storage medium. We examined how bees utilize different-aged stored pollen during an extended pollen flow. The deposition of pollen into wax cells and subsequent consumption were monitored daily on 18 brood frames from 6 colonies over an 8d observation period. Despite a greater abundance of older stored pollen cells on brood frames, bees showed a marked preference for the consumption of freshly-stored pollen. Two to four day-old pollen cell contents were significantly more likely to be consumed, while pollen cell contents more than seven days old were eaten at much lower rates. Similar experiments that controlled for cell abundance and spatial effects using cage assays yielded the same result. One day-old stored pollen was consumed approximately three times more often than 10d-old stored pollen, and two times more often than 5d-old stored pollen. These consumption preferences for freshly-stored pollen occurred despite a lack of clear developmental advantages. Young adult workers reared for 7 days on 1d-, 5d-, or 10d-old stored pollen showed no difference in body mass, stored pollen consumption, hindgut fecal material accumulation, or hypopharyngeal gland (HPG) protein titers, suggesting that different-aged pollen stores did not vary in their nutritional value to adult bees. These findings are inconsistent with the hypothesis promoting a period of microbially-mediated, "beebread maturation" that results in greater palatability or nutritive value for aged pollen stores. Rather, stored pollen that is not eaten in the first few days accumulates as excess stores preserved in a less preferred, but nutritionally-similar state.Note
Open access journal.ISSN
1932-6203PubMed ID
28430801Version
Final published versionSponsors
University of Arizona UBRP scholarship; USDA-ARS, an equal opportunity employer and providerAdditional Links
http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0175933ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1371/journal.pone.0175933
Scopus Count
Collections
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication.

