Show simple item record

SOME INITIAL RESULTS FOR DATA-AIDED EQUALIZER EXPERIMENTS AT EDWARDS AFB

dc.contributor.authorRice, Michael
dc.contributor.authorHogstrom, Christopher
dc.contributor.authorNash, Christopher
dc.contributor.authorRavert, Jeffrey
dc.contributor.authorCole-Rhodes, Arlene
dc.contributor.authorMoazzami, Farzad
dc.contributor.authorSaquib, Mohammad
dc.contributor.authorAfran, Md. Shah
dc.contributor.authorPerrins, Erik
dc.contributor.authorTemple, Kip
dc.date.accessioned2017-06-20T15:52:21Z
dc.date.available2017-06-20T15:52:21Z
dc.date.issued2016-11
dc.identifier.issn0884-5123
dc.identifier.issn0074-9079
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/624233
dc.description.abstractThis paper describes the results of flight tests designed to compare data-aided equalization to blind, adaptive equalization using SOQPSK-TG in aeronautical telemetry. The flight tests were conducted on 3 June 2016 at the Air Force Flight Test Center, Edwards AFB, at upper L band (1801.5 MHz) and at C band (4711.5 MHz). Five data-aided equalizers were implemented and compared to a commercially available blind equalizer. In addition, all equalized bit streams were compared to an unequalized reference. The results show that the blind equalizer tends to be either really good or really bad. In contrast, the data-aided equalizers tend to exhibit more graceful degradation. Which equalization method is “best” is not clear as of this writing. The answer depends on a number factors that will become clear as more data from the experiments is analyzed.
dc.description.sponsorshipInternational Foundation for Telemeteringen
dc.language.isoen_USen
dc.publisherInternational Foundation for Telemeteringen
dc.relation.urlhttp://www.telemetry.org/en
dc.rightsCopyright © held by the author; distribution rights International Foundation for Telemeteringen
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
dc.titleSOME INITIAL RESULTS FOR DATA-AIDED EQUALIZER EXPERIMENTS AT EDWARDS AFBen_US
dc.typetexten
dc.typeProceedingsen
dc.contributor.departmentBrigham Young Universityen
dc.contributor.departmentMorgan State Universityen
dc.contributor.departmentUniversity of Texas at Dallasen
dc.contributor.departmentUniversity of Kansasen
dc.contributor.departmentEdwards AFBen
dc.identifier.journalInternational Telemetering Conference Proceedingsen
dc.description.collectioninformationProceedings from the International Telemetering Conference are made available by the International Foundation for Telemetering and the University of Arizona Libraries. Visit http://www.telemetry.org/index.php/contact-us if you have questions about items in this collection.en
refterms.dateFOA2018-06-06T03:39:23Z
html.description.abstractThis paper describes the results of flight tests designed to compare data-aided equalization to blind, adaptive equalization using SOQPSK-TG in aeronautical telemetry. The flight tests were conducted on 3 June 2016 at the Air Force Flight Test Center, Edwards AFB, at upper L band (1801.5 MHz) and at C band (4711.5 MHz). Five data-aided equalizers were implemented and compared to a commercially available blind equalizer. In addition, all equalized bit streams were compared to an unequalized reference. The results show that the blind equalizer tends to be either really good or really bad. In contrast, the data-aided equalizers tend to exhibit more graceful degradation. Which equalization method is “best” is not clear as of this writing. The answer depends on a number factors that will become clear as more data from the experiments is analyzed.


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
ITC_2016_16-12-05.pdf
Size:
559.8Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Conference Proceedings
Download

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record