Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorFankhauser, Marthaen
dc.contributor.advisorSlack, Marionen
dc.contributor.authorBrown, Jessica
dc.contributor.authorWhittington, Lisa M.
dc.date.accessioned2017-06-22T16:35:50Z
dc.date.available2017-06-22T16:35:50Z
dc.date.issued2007
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/624324
dc.descriptionClass of 2007 Abstracten
dc.description.abstractObjectives: To identify differences between patients diagnosed with a serious mental illness who test positive for cocaine and/or methamphetamine compared to patients who test positive or other abused substances. Methods: This retrospective study of clinical data obtained through a community mental health agency that provides outpatient services for patients with a serious mental illness. The study population was divided into two subgroups: positive cocaine and/or methamphetamine drug screen versus other positive drug screens and were compared over a 12- month period for the frequency and types of positive drug screens and blood alcohol levels, days of court-ordered treatment, the number of psychiatric hospitalizations and length of stay, primary psychiatric diagnosis, and the cost of care for services provided. Results: More females were in the “cocaine/methamphetamine” group versus more males in the “other substances of abuse” group, (p < 0.01). A higher proportion of patients diagnosed with psychotic disorders tested positive for “other substances” than for “cocaine and methamphetamine” (p < 0.01) and the “cocaine/methamphetamine” group had significantly more mood and anxiety disorders than the other group (p < 0.05). The frequency of patients testing positive for marijuana, methadone, and other opiates was higher in the “other substance abuse” group (p < 0.001). Patients in the “cocaine/methamphetamine” group had higher rates of polysubstance abuse (p < 0.001). The most commonly abused substance was cocaine (53.8%). Conclusions: Regular drug screening for substances of abuse and utilization of drug treatment programs should be recommended for SMI patients to improve their care and treatment outcomes.
dc.language.isoen_USen
dc.publisherThe University of Arizona.en
dc.rightsCopyright © is held by the author.en
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
dc.subjectMental Illnessen
dc.subjectSubstance Abuseen
dc.subjectMethamphetamineen
dc.subjectCocaineen
dc.subject.meshMental Disordersen
dc.subject.meshSubstance Abuse Detectionen
dc.subject.meshMethamphetamineen
dc.subject.meshCocaineen
dc.titlePositive Drug Screens for Methamphetamine and/or Cocaine Versus Other Substances of Abuse in Patients with Serious Mental Illnesses: Comparison of Polysubstance Abuse, Psychiatric Hospitalizations, Prescribed Psychotropic Medications, and Cost of Servicesen_US
dc.typetexten
dc.typeElectronic Reporten
dc.contributor.departmentCollege of Pharmacy, The University of Arizonaen
dc.description.collectioninformationThis item is part of the Pharmacy Student Research Projects collection, made available by the College of Pharmacy and the University Libraries at the University of Arizona. For more information about items in this collection, please contact Jennifer Martin, Librarian and Clinical Instructor, Pharmacy Practice and Science, jenmartin@email.arizona.edu.en
html.description.abstractObjectives: To identify differences between patients diagnosed with a serious mental illness who test positive for cocaine and/or methamphetamine compared to patients who test positive or other abused substances. Methods: This retrospective study of clinical data obtained through a community mental health agency that provides outpatient services for patients with a serious mental illness. The study population was divided into two subgroups: positive cocaine and/or methamphetamine drug screen versus other positive drug screens and were compared over a 12- month period for the frequency and types of positive drug screens and blood alcohol levels, days of court-ordered treatment, the number of psychiatric hospitalizations and length of stay, primary psychiatric diagnosis, and the cost of care for services provided. Results: More females were in the “cocaine/methamphetamine” group versus more males in the “other substances of abuse” group, (p < 0.01). A higher proportion of patients diagnosed with psychotic disorders tested positive for “other substances” than for “cocaine and methamphetamine” (p < 0.01) and the “cocaine/methamphetamine” group had significantly more mood and anxiety disorders than the other group (p < 0.05). The frequency of patients testing positive for marijuana, methadone, and other opiates was higher in the “other substance abuse” group (p < 0.001). Patients in the “cocaine/methamphetamine” group had higher rates of polysubstance abuse (p < 0.001). The most commonly abused substance was cocaine (53.8%). Conclusions: Regular drug screening for substances of abuse and utilization of drug treatment programs should be recommended for SMI patients to improve their care and treatment outcomes.


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record