AffiliationUniv Arizona, Dept Ophthalmol, Coll Opt Sci
Univ Arizona, Coll Engn, Dept Aerosp & Mech
central corneal thickness
MetadataShow full item record
PublisherDOVE MEDICAL PRESS LTD
CitationGoldmann tonometer error correcting prism: clinical evaluation 2017, Volume 11:835 Clinical Ophthalmology
Rights© 2017 McCafferty et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License
Collection InformationThis item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at firstname.lastname@example.org.
AbstractPurpose: Clinically evaluate a modified applanating surface Goldmann tonometer prism designed to substantially negate errors due to patient variability in biomechanics. Methods: A modified Goldmann prism with a correcting applanation tonometry surface (CATS) was mathematically optimized to minimize the intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement error due to patient variability in corneal thickness, stiffness, curvature, and tear film adhesion force. A comparative clinical study of 109 eyes measured IOP with CATS and Goldmann prisms. The IOP measurement differences between the CATS and Goldmann prisms were correlated to corneal thickness, hysteresis, and curvature. Results: The CATS tonometer prism in correcting for Goldmann central corneal thickness (CCT) error demonstrated a reduction to <+/- 2 mmHg in 97% of a standard CCT population. This compares to only 54% with CCT error <+/- 2 mmHg using the Goldmann prism. Equal reductions of similar to 50% in errors due to corneal rigidity and curvature were also demonstrated. Conclusion: The results validate the CATS prism's improved accuracy and expected reduced sensitivity to Goldmann errors without IOP bias as predicted by mathematical modeling. The CATS replacement for the Goldmann prism does not change Goldmann measurement technique or interpretation.
VersionFinal published version
SponsorsNIH SBIR [R43 EY026821-01]
- Goldmann Tonometer Prism with an Optimized Error Correcting Applanation Surface.
- Authors: McCafferty S, Lim G, Duncan W, Enikov E, Schwiegerling J
- Issue date: 2016 Sep
- Goldmann and error correcting tonometry prisms compared to intracameral pressure.
- Authors: McCafferty S, Levine J, Schwiegerling J, Enikov ET
- Issue date: 2018 Jan 4
- Goldmann tonometry tear film error and partial correction with a shaped applanation surface.
- Authors: McCafferty SJ, Enikov ET, Schwiegerling J, Ashley SM
- Issue date: 2018
- Comparison of intraocular pressure adjusted by central corneal thickness or corneal biomechanical properties as measured in glaucomatous eyes using noncontact tonometers and the Goldmann applanation tonometer.
- Authors: Yaoeda K, Fukushima A, Shirakashi M, Fukuchi T
- Issue date: 2016
- Effects of central corneal thickness and corneal curvature on the intraocular pressure measurement by Goldmann applanation tonometer and ocular blood flow pneumatonometer.
- Authors: Saleh TA, Adams M, McDermott B, Claridge KG, Ewings P
- Issue date: 2006 Aug