Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMcCafferty, Sean
dc.contributor.authorLim, Garrett
dc.contributor.authorDuncan, William
dc.contributor.authorEnikov, Eniko
dc.contributor.authorSchwiegerling, Jim
dc.contributor.authorLevine, Jason
dc.contributor.authorKew, Corin
dc.date.accessioned2017-07-06T23:09:30Z
dc.date.available2017-07-06T23:09:30Z
dc.date.issued2017-05
dc.identifier.citationGoldmann tonometer error correcting prism: clinical evaluation 2017, Volume 11:835 Clinical Ophthalmologyen
dc.identifier.issn1177-5483
dc.identifier.pmid28496302
dc.identifier.doi10.2147/OPTH.S135272
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/624648
dc.description.abstractPurpose: Clinically evaluate a modified applanating surface Goldmann tonometer prism designed to substantially negate errors due to patient variability in biomechanics. Methods: A modified Goldmann prism with a correcting applanation tonometry surface (CATS) was mathematically optimized to minimize the intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement error due to patient variability in corneal thickness, stiffness, curvature, and tear film adhesion force. A comparative clinical study of 109 eyes measured IOP with CATS and Goldmann prisms. The IOP measurement differences between the CATS and Goldmann prisms were correlated to corneal thickness, hysteresis, and curvature. Results: The CATS tonometer prism in correcting for Goldmann central corneal thickness (CCT) error demonstrated a reduction to <+/- 2 mmHg in 97% of a standard CCT population. This compares to only 54% with CCT error <+/- 2 mmHg using the Goldmann prism. Equal reductions of similar to 50% in errors due to corneal rigidity and curvature were also demonstrated. Conclusion: The results validate the CATS prism's improved accuracy and expected reduced sensitivity to Goldmann errors without IOP bias as predicted by mathematical modeling. The CATS replacement for the Goldmann prism does not change Goldmann measurement technique or interpretation.
dc.description.sponsorshipNIH SBIR [R43 EY026821-01]en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherDOVE MEDICAL PRESS LTDen
dc.relation.urlhttps://www.dovepress.com/goldmann-tonometer-error-correcting-prism-clinical-evaluation-peer-reviewed-article-OPTHen
dc.rights© 2017 McCafferty et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License.en
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/
dc.subjectglaucomaen
dc.subjecttonometryen
dc.subjectGoldmannen
dc.subjectIOPen
dc.subjectintraocular pressureen
dc.subjectappalnation tonometeren
dc.subjectcorneal biomechanicsen
dc.subjectCATS tonometeren
dc.subjectCCTen
dc.subjectcentral corneal thicknessen
dc.subjecttonometer erroren
dc.titleGoldmann tonometer error correcting prism: clinical evaluationen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.contributor.departmentUniv Arizona, Dept Ophthalmol, Coll Opt Scien
dc.contributor.departmentUniv Arizona, Coll Engn, Dept Aerosp & Mechen
dc.identifier.journalClinical Ophthalmologyen
dc.description.collectioninformationThis item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.en
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen
refterms.dateFOA2018-09-11T21:08:39Z
html.description.abstractPurpose: Clinically evaluate a modified applanating surface Goldmann tonometer prism designed to substantially negate errors due to patient variability in biomechanics. Methods: A modified Goldmann prism with a correcting applanation tonometry surface (CATS) was mathematically optimized to minimize the intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement error due to patient variability in corneal thickness, stiffness, curvature, and tear film adhesion force. A comparative clinical study of 109 eyes measured IOP with CATS and Goldmann prisms. The IOP measurement differences between the CATS and Goldmann prisms were correlated to corneal thickness, hysteresis, and curvature. Results: The CATS tonometer prism in correcting for Goldmann central corneal thickness (CCT) error demonstrated a reduction to <+/- 2 mmHg in 97% of a standard CCT population. This compares to only 54% with CCT error <+/- 2 mmHg using the Goldmann prism. Equal reductions of similar to 50% in errors due to corneal rigidity and curvature were also demonstrated. Conclusion: The results validate the CATS prism's improved accuracy and expected reduced sensitivity to Goldmann errors without IOP bias as predicted by mathematical modeling. The CATS replacement for the Goldmann prism does not change Goldmann measurement technique or interpretation.


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
OPTH-135272-goldmann-tonometer ...
Size:
2.157Mb
Format:
PDF
Description:
FInal Published Version

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2017 McCafferty et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © 2017 McCafferty et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License.