Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorNearing, Mark A.
dc.contributor.authorPolyakov, Viktor O.
dc.contributor.authorNichols, Mary H.
dc.contributor.authorHernandez, Mariano
dc.contributor.authorLi, Li
dc.contributor.authorZhao, Ying
dc.contributor.authorArmendariz, Gerardo
dc.date.accessioned2017-07-27T18:09:16Z
dc.date.available2017-07-27T18:09:16Z
dc.date.issued2017-06-30
dc.identifier.citationSlope–velocity equilibrium and evolution of surface roughness on a stony hillslope 2017, 21 (6):3221 Hydrology and Earth System Sciencesen
dc.identifier.issn1607-7938
dc.identifier.doi10.5194/hess-21-3221-2017
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/624932
dc.description.abstractSlope–velocity equilibrium is hypothesized as a state that evolves naturally over time due to the interaction between overland flow and surface morphology, wherein steeper areas develop a relative increase in physical and hydraulic roughness such that flow velocity is a unique function of overland flow rate independent of slope gradient. This study tests this hypothesis under controlled conditions. Artificial rainfall was applied to 2 m by 6 m plots at 5, 12, and 20 % slope gradients. A series of simulations were made with two replications for each treatment with measurements of runoff rate, velocity, rock cover, and surface roughness. Velocities measured at the end of each experiment were a unique function of discharge rates, independent of slope gradient or rainfall intensity. Physical surface roughness was greater at steeper slopes. The data clearly showed that there was no unique hydraulic coefficient for a given slope, surface condition, or rainfall rate, with hydraulic roughness greater at steeper slopes and lower intensities. This study supports the hypothesis of slope–velocity equilibrium, implying that use of hydraulic equations, such as Chezy and Manning, in hillslope-scale runoff models is problematic because the coefficients vary with both slope and rainfall intensity.
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherCOPERNICUS GESELLSCHAFT MBHen
dc.relation.urlhttps://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/21/3221/2017/en
dc.rights© Author(s) 2017. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.en
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/
dc.titleSlope–velocity equilibrium and evolution of surface roughness on a stony hillslopeen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.contributor.departmentUniv Arizona, Sch Nat Resources & Environmen
dc.identifier.journalHydrology and Earth System Sciencesen
dc.description.noteOpen Access Journalen
dc.description.collectioninformationThis item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.en
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen
refterms.dateFOA2018-05-29T08:11:11Z
html.description.abstractSlope–velocity equilibrium is hypothesized as a state that evolves naturally over time due to the interaction between overland flow and surface morphology, wherein steeper areas develop a relative increase in physical and hydraulic roughness such that flow velocity is a unique function of overland flow rate independent of slope gradient. This study tests this hypothesis under controlled conditions. Artificial rainfall was applied to 2 m by 6 m plots at 5, 12, and 20 % slope gradients. A series of simulations were made with two replications for each treatment with measurements of runoff rate, velocity, rock cover, and surface roughness. Velocities measured at the end of each experiment were a unique function of discharge rates, independent of slope gradient or rainfall intensity. Physical surface roughness was greater at steeper slopes. The data clearly showed that there was no unique hydraulic coefficient for a given slope, surface condition, or rainfall rate, with hydraulic roughness greater at steeper slopes and lower intensities. This study supports the hypothesis of slope–velocity equilibrium, implying that use of hydraulic equations, such as Chezy and Manning, in hillslope-scale runoff models is problematic because the coefficients vary with both slope and rainfall intensity.


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
hess-21-3221-2017.pdf
Size:
1.847Mb
Format:
PDF
Description:
FInal Published Version

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© Author(s) 2017. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © Author(s) 2017. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.