Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDiRienzo, Nicholas
dc.contributor.authorDornhaus, Anna
dc.date.accessioned2017-07-27T18:33:06Z
dc.date.available2017-07-27T18:33:06Z
dc.date.issued2017-06-21
dc.identifier.citationTemnothorax rugatulus ant colonies consistently vary in nest structure across time and context 2017, 12 (6):e0177598 PLOS ONEen
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203
dc.identifier.pmid28636616
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0177598
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/624944
dc.description.abstractA host of animals build architectural constructions. Such constructions frequently vary with environmental and individual/colony conditions, and their architecture directly influences behavior and fitness. The nests of ant colonies drive and enable many of their collective behaviors, and as such are part of their 'extended phenotype'. Since ant colonies have been recently shown to differ in behavior and life history strategy, we ask whether colonies differ in another trait: the architecture of the constructions they create. We allowed Temnothorax rugatulus rock ants, who create nests by building walls within narrow rock gaps, to repeatedly build nest walls in a fixed crevice but under two environmental conditions. We find that colonies consistently differ in their architecture across environments and over nest building events. Colony identity explained 12-40% of the variation in nest architecture, while colony properties and environmental conditions explained 5-20%, as indicated by the condition and marginal R-2 values. When their nest boxes were covered, which produced higher humidity and lower airflow, colonies built thicker, longer, and heavier walls. Colonies also built more robust walls when they had more brood, suggesting a protective function of wall thickness. This is, to our knowledge, the first study to explicitly investigate the repeatability of nestbuilding behavior in a controlled environment. Our results suggest that colonies may face tradeoffs, perhaps between factors such as active vs. passive nest defense, and that selection may act on individual construction rules as a mechanisms to mediate colony-level behavior.
dc.description.sponsorshipUniversity of Arizona Postdoctoral Excellence in Research and Teaching Fellowship (National Institute of Health) [5K12GM000708-17]en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherPUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCEen
dc.relation.urlhttp://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0177598en
dc.rights© 2017 DiRienzo, Dornhaus. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License.en
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.titleTemnothorax rugatulus ant colonies consistently vary in nest structure across time and contexten
dc.typeArticleen
dc.contributor.departmentUniv Arizona, Dept Ecol & Evolut Biolen
dc.identifier.journalPLOS ONEen
dc.description.noteOpen Access Journal.en
dc.description.collectioninformationThis item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.en
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen
refterms.dateFOA2018-09-11T21:47:41Z
html.description.abstractA host of animals build architectural constructions. Such constructions frequently vary with environmental and individual/colony conditions, and their architecture directly influences behavior and fitness. The nests of ant colonies drive and enable many of their collective behaviors, and as such are part of their 'extended phenotype'. Since ant colonies have been recently shown to differ in behavior and life history strategy, we ask whether colonies differ in another trait: the architecture of the constructions they create. We allowed Temnothorax rugatulus rock ants, who create nests by building walls within narrow rock gaps, to repeatedly build nest walls in a fixed crevice but under two environmental conditions. We find that colonies consistently differ in their architecture across environments and over nest building events. Colony identity explained 12-40% of the variation in nest architecture, while colony properties and environmental conditions explained 5-20%, as indicated by the condition and marginal R-2 values. When their nest boxes were covered, which produced higher humidity and lower airflow, colonies built thicker, longer, and heavier walls. Colonies also built more robust walls when they had more brood, suggesting a protective function of wall thickness. This is, to our knowledge, the first study to explicitly investigate the repeatability of nestbuilding behavior in a controlled environment. Our results suggest that colonies may face tradeoffs, perhaps between factors such as active vs. passive nest defense, and that selection may act on individual construction rules as a mechanisms to mediate colony-level behavior.


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
journal.pone.0177598.pdf
Size:
1.217Mb
Format:
PDF
Description:
FInal Published Version

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2017 DiRienzo, Dornhaus. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © 2017 DiRienzo, Dornhaus. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License.