Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorChen, Yujia
dc.contributor.authorLou, Yang
dc.contributor.authorKupinski, Matthew A.
dc.contributor.authorAnastasio, Mark A.
dc.date.accessioned2017-08-09T23:35:57Z
dc.date.available2017-08-09T23:35:57Z
dc.date.issued2017-03-10
dc.identifier.citationYujia Chen ; Yang Lou ; Matthew A. Kupinski and Mark A. Anastasio " Task-based data-acquisition optimization for sparse image reconstruction systems ", Proc. SPIE 10136, Medical Imaging 2017: Image Perception, Observer Performance, and Technology Assessment, 101360Z (March 10, 2017); doi:10.1117/12.2255536; http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.2255536en
dc.identifier.issn0277-786X
dc.identifier.doi10.1117/12.2255536
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/625209
dc.description.abstractConventional wisdom dictates that imaging hardware should be optimized by use of an ideal observer (TO) that exploits full statistical knowledge of the class of objects to be imaged, without consideration of the reconstruction method to be employed. However, accurate and tractable models of the complete object statistics are often difficult to determine in practice. Moreover, in imaging systems that employ compressive sensing concepts, imaging hardware and (sparse) image reconstruction are innately coupled technologies. We have previously proposed a sparsity-driven ideal observer (SDIO) that can be employed to optimize hardware by use of a stochastic object model that describes object sparsity. The SDIO and sparse reconstruction method can therefore be "matched" in the sense that they both utilize the same statistical information regarding the class of objects to be imaged. To efficiently compute SDIO performance, the posterior distribution is estimated by use of computational tools developed recently for variational Bayesian inference. Subsequently, the SDIO test statistic can be computed semi-analytically. The advantages of employing the SDIO instead of a Hotelling observer are systematically demonstrated in case studies in which magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data acquisition schemes are optimized for signal detection tasks.
dc.description.sponsorshipNIH [EB02016802, EB02060401]en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherSPIE-INT SOC OPTICAL ENGINEERINGen
dc.relation.urlhttp://proceedings.spiedigitallibrary.org/proceeding.aspx?doi=10.1117/12.2255536en
dc.rights© 2017 SPIE.en
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
dc.subjectNumerial observersen
dc.subjectimaging system optimizationen
dc.titleTask-based data-acquisition optimization for sparse image reconstruction systemsen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.contributor.departmentUniv Arizona, Ctr Opt Scien
dc.identifier.journalMEDICAL IMAGING 2017: IMAGE PERCEPTION, OBSERVER PERFORMANCE, AND TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENTen
dc.description.collectioninformationThis item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.en
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen
dc.contributor.institutionWashington Univ. in St. Louis (United States)
dc.contributor.institutionWashington Univ. in St. Louis (United States)
dc.contributor.institutionCollege of Optical Sciences, The Univ. of Arizona (United States)
dc.contributor.institutionWashington Univ. in St. Louis (United States)
refterms.dateFOA2018-06-17T18:47:35Z
html.description.abstractConventional wisdom dictates that imaging hardware should be optimized by use of an ideal observer (TO) that exploits full statistical knowledge of the class of objects to be imaged, without consideration of the reconstruction method to be employed. However, accurate and tractable models of the complete object statistics are often difficult to determine in practice. Moreover, in imaging systems that employ compressive sensing concepts, imaging hardware and (sparse) image reconstruction are innately coupled technologies. We have previously proposed a sparsity-driven ideal observer (SDIO) that can be employed to optimize hardware by use of a stochastic object model that describes object sparsity. The SDIO and sparse reconstruction method can therefore be "matched" in the sense that they both utilize the same statistical information regarding the class of objects to be imaged. To efficiently compute SDIO performance, the posterior distribution is estimated by use of computational tools developed recently for variational Bayesian inference. Subsequently, the SDIO test statistic can be computed semi-analytically. The advantages of employing the SDIO instead of a Hotelling observer are systematically demonstrated in case studies in which magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data acquisition schemes are optimized for signal detection tasks.


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
101360Z.pdf
Size:
391.7Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
FInal Published Version

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record