Barriers to the Access of Bevacizumab in Patients with Solid Tumors and the Potential Impact of Biosimilars: A Physician Survey
dc.contributor.author | Monk, Bradley | |
dc.contributor.author | Lammers, Philip | |
dc.contributor.author | Cartwright, Thomas | |
dc.contributor.author | Jacobs, Ira | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-10-09T23:16:29Z | |
dc.date.available | 2017-10-09T23:16:29Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2017-01-28 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Barriers to the Access of Bevacizumab in Patients with Solid Tumors and the Potential Impact of Biosimilars: A Physician Survey 2017, 10 (1):19 Pharmaceuticals | en |
dc.identifier.issn | 1424-8247 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.3390/ph10010019 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10150/625838 | |
dc.description.abstract | Access to bevacizumab, an important component of oncology treatment regimens, may be limited. This survey of oncologists in the US (n = 150), Europe (n = 230), and emerging markets (EM: Brazil, Mexico, and Turkey; n = 130) examined use of and barriers to accessing bevacizumab as treatment of advanced solid tumors. We also assessed the likelihood that physicians would prescribe a bevacizumab biosimilar, if available. Bevacizumab was frequently used as early-line therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer, metastatic non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer, and metastatic ovarian cancer (all markets), and as a second-line therapy in glioblastoma multiforme (US, EM). A greater percentage of EM-based physicians cited access-related issues as a barrier to prescribing bevacizumab versus US and EU physicians. Lack of reimbursement and high out-of-pocket costs were cited as predominant barriers to prescribing and common reasons for reducing the number of planned cycles. Overall, similar to 50% of physicians reported they "definitely" or "probably" would prescribe a bevacizumab biosimilar, if available. Efficacy and safety data in specific tumor types and lower cost were factors cited that would increase likelihood to prescribe a bevacizumab biosimilar. A lower cost bevacizumab biosimilar could address the unmet needs of patients and physicians worldwide, and may have the greatest impact on patient outcomes in EM. | |
dc.description.sponsorship | Pfizer Inc. | en |
dc.language.iso | en | en |
dc.publisher | MDPI AG | en |
dc.relation.url | http://www.mdpi.com/1424-8247/10/1/19 | en |
dc.rights | © 2017 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. | en |
dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | |
dc.subject | access to health care | en |
dc.subject | bevacizumab | en |
dc.subject | biosimilars | en |
dc.subject | colorectal cancer | en |
dc.subject | non-small-cell lung cancer | en |
dc.subject | ovarian cancer | en |
dc.title | Barriers to the Access of Bevacizumab in Patients with Solid Tumors and the Potential Impact of Biosimilars: A Physician Survey | en |
dc.type | Article | en |
dc.contributor.department | Univ Arizona | en |
dc.identifier.journal | Pharmaceuticals | en |
dc.description.note | Open Access Journal. | en |
dc.description.collectioninformation | This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu. | en |
dc.eprint.version | Final published version | en |
refterms.dateFOA | 2018-07-02T20:35:12Z | |
html.description.abstract | Access to bevacizumab, an important component of oncology treatment regimens, may be limited. This survey of oncologists in the US (n = 150), Europe (n = 230), and emerging markets (EM: Brazil, Mexico, and Turkey; n = 130) examined use of and barriers to accessing bevacizumab as treatment of advanced solid tumors. We also assessed the likelihood that physicians would prescribe a bevacizumab biosimilar, if available. Bevacizumab was frequently used as early-line therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer, metastatic non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer, and metastatic ovarian cancer (all markets), and as a second-line therapy in glioblastoma multiforme (US, EM). A greater percentage of EM-based physicians cited access-related issues as a barrier to prescribing bevacizumab versus US and EU physicians. Lack of reimbursement and high out-of-pocket costs were cited as predominant barriers to prescribing and common reasons for reducing the number of planned cycles. Overall, similar to 50% of physicians reported they "definitely" or "probably" would prescribe a bevacizumab biosimilar, if available. Efficacy and safety data in specific tumor types and lower cost were factors cited that would increase likelihood to prescribe a bevacizumab biosimilar. A lower cost bevacizumab biosimilar could address the unmet needs of patients and physicians worldwide, and may have the greatest impact on patient outcomes in EM. |