Racioethnic Differences in Human Posterior Scleral and Optic Nerve Stump Deformation
Name:
i1552-5783-58-10-4235.pdf
Size:
2.121Mb
Format:
PDF
Description:
FInal Published Version
Author
Tamimi, Ehab A.Pyne, Jeffrey D.
Muli, Dominic K.
Axman, Katelyn F.
Howerton, Stephen J.
Davis, Matthew R.
Girkin, Christopher A.
Vande Geest, Jonathan P.
Affiliation
Univ Arizona, Dept Aerosp & Mech EngnIssue Date
2017-08-28
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
ASSOC RESEARCH VISION OPHTHALMOLOGY INCCitation
Racioethnic Differences in Human Posterior Scleral and Optic Nerve Stump Deformation 2017, 58 (10):4235 Investigative Opthalmology & Visual ScienceRights
Copyright © 2017 The Authors. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
PURPOSE. The purpose of this study was to quantify the biomechanical response of human posterior ocular tissues from donors of various racioethnic groups to better understand how differences in these properties may play a role in the racioethnic health disparities known to exist in glaucoma. METHODS. Sequential digital image correlation (S-DIC) was used to measure the pressure-induced surface deformations of 23 normal human posterior poles from three racioethnic groups: African descent (AD), European descent (ED), and Hispanic ethnicity (HIS). Regional in-plane principal strains were compared across three zones: the optic nerve stump (ONS), the peripapillary (PP) sclera, and non-PP sclera. RESULTS. The PP scleral tensile strains were found to be lower for ED eyes compared with AD and HIS eyes at 15 mm Hg (P = 0.024 and 0.039, respectively). The mean compressive strains were significantly higher for AD eyes compared with ED eyes at 15 mm Hg (P = 0.018). We also found that the relationship between tensile strain and pressure was significant for those of ED and HIS eyes (P < 0.001 and P = 0.004, respectively), whereas it was not significant for those of AD (P = 0.392). CONCLUSIONS. Our results suggest that, assuming glaucomatous nerve loss is caused by mechanical strains in the vicinity of the optic nerve head, the mechanism of increased glaucoma prevalence may be different in those of AD versus HIS. Our ONS strain analysis also suggested that it may be important to account for ONS geometry and material properties in future scleral biomechanical analysis.Note
Open access journal.ISSN
1552-5783PubMed ID
28846773Version
Final published versionSponsors
National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health [R01EY020890]; National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering Award [EB003392]Additional Links
http://iovs.arvojournals.org/article.aspx?doi=10.1167/iovs.17-22141ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1167/iovs.17-22141
Scopus Count
Collections
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Copyright © 2017 The Authors. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

