A dominant-negative mutant inhibits multiple prion variants through a common mechanism
Name:
journal.pgen.1007085.pdf
Size:
5.541Mb
Format:
PDF
Description:
FInal Published Version
Affiliation
Univ Arizona, Dept Mol & Cellular BiolIssue Date
2017-10-30
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCECitation
A dominant-negative mutant inhibits multiple prion variants through a common mechanism 2017, 13 (10):e1007085 PLOS GeneticsJournal
PLOS GeneticsRights
© 2017 Pei et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
Prions adopt alternative, self-replicating protein conformations and thereby determine novel phenotypes that are often irreversible. Nevertheless, dominant-negative prion mutants can revert phenotypes associated with some conformations. These observations suggest that, while intervention is possible, distinct inhibitors must be developed to overcome the conformational plasticity of prions. To understand the basis of this specificity, we determined the impact of the G58D mutant of the Sup35 prion on three of its conformational variants, which form amyloids in S. cerevisiae. G58D had been previously proposed to have unique effects on these variants, but our studies suggest a common mechanism. All variants, including those reported to be resistant, are inhibited by G58D but at distinct doses. G58D lowers the kinetic stability of the associated amyloid, enhancing its fragmentation by molecular chaperones, promoting Sup35 resolubilization, and leading to amyloid clearance particularly in daughter cells. Reducing the availability or activity of the chaperone Hsp104, even transiently, reverses curing. Thus, the specificity of inhibition is determined by the sensitivity of variants to the mutant dosage rather than mode of action, challenging the view that a unique inhibitor must be developed to combat each variant.Note
Open access journal.ISSN
1553-7404PubMed ID
29084237Version
Final published versionSponsors
National Institute of General Medical Sciences [R01 GM1100740, R35 GM118042]Additional Links
http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1007085ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1371/journal.pgen.1007085
Scopus Count
Collections
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © 2017 Pei et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License.
Related articles
- Impact of Amyloid Polymorphism on Prion-Chaperone Interactions in Yeast.
- Authors: Killian AN, Miller SC, Hines JK
- Issue date: 2019 Apr 16
- How Do Yeast Cells Contend with Prions?
- Authors: Wickner RB, Edskes HK, Son M, Wu S, Niznikiewicz M
- Issue date: 2020 Jul 3
- Prion Variants of Yeast are Numerous, Mutable, and Segregate on Growth, Affecting Prion Pathogenesis, Transmission Barriers, and Sensitivity to Anti-Prion Systems.
- Authors: Wickner RB, Son M, Edskes HK
- Issue date: 2019 Mar 9
- Life cycle of yeast prions: propagation mediated by amyloid fibrils.
- Authors: Inoue Y
- Issue date: 2009
- [Yeast as a model for studying the prion and amyloid occurrence].
- Authors: Kryndushkin DS, Aleksandrov IM, Kushnirov VV, Ter-Avanesian MD
- Issue date: 2004 May

