Mixed integer programming with dose-volume constraints in intensity-modulated proton therapy
AffiliationUniv Arizona, Dept Syst & Ind Engn
MetadataShow full item record
CitationMixed integer programming with dose-volume constraints in intensity-modulated proton therapy 2017, 18 (5):29 Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics
Rights© 2017 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License.
Collection InformationThis item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at firstname.lastname@example.org.
AbstractBackground: In treatment planning for intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT), we aim to deliver the prescribed dose to the target yet minimize the dose to adjacent healthy tissue. Mixed-integer programming (MIP) has been applied in radiation therapy to generate treatment plans. However, MIP has not been used effectively for IMPT treatment planning with dose-volume constraints. In this study, we incorporated dose-volume constraints in an MIP model to generate treatment plans for IMPT. Methods: We created a new MIP model for IMPT with dose volume constraints. Two groups of IMPT treatment plans were generated for each of three patients by using MIP models for a total of six plans: one plan was derived with the Limited-memory Broyden-Fletcher-Goldfarb-Shanno (L-BFGS) method while the other plan was derived with our MIP model with dose-volume constraints. We then compared these two plans by dose-volume histogram (DVH) indices to evaluate the performance of the new MIP model with dose-volume constraints. In addition, we developed a model to more efficiently find the best balance between tumor coverage and normal tissue protection. Results: The MIP model with dose-volume constraints generates IMPT treatment plans with comparable target dose coverage, target dose homogeneity, and the maximum dose to organs at risk (OARs) compared to treatment plans from the conventional quadratic programming method without any tedious trial-and-error process. Some notable reduction in the mean doses of OARs is observed. Conclusions: The treatment plans from our MIP model with dose-volume constraints can meetall dose-volume constraints for OARs and targets without any tedious trial-and-error process. This model has the potential to automatically generate IMPT plans with consistent plan quality among different treatment planners and across institutions and better protection for important parallel OARs in an effective way.
VersionFinal published version
SponsorsNational Cancer Institute (NCI) [K25CA168984]
- Robust treatment planning with conditional value at risk chance constraints in intensity-modulated proton therapy.
- Authors: An Y, Liang J, Schild SE, Bues M, Liu W
- Issue date: 2017 Jan
- Dosimetric comparison of distal esophageal carcinoma plans for patients treated with small-spot intensity-modulated proton versus volumetric-modulated arc therapies.
- Authors: Liu C, Bhangoo RS, Sio TT, Yu NY, Shan J, Chiang JS, Ding JX, Rule WG, Korte S, Lara P, Ding X, Bues M, Hu Y, DeWees T, Ashman JB, Liu W
- Issue date: 2019 Jul
- Robust intensity-modulated proton therapy to reduce high linear energy transfer in organs at risk.
- Authors: An Y, Shan J, Patel SH, Wong W, Schild SE, Ding X, Bues M, Liu W
- Issue date: 2017 Dec
- Simultaneous beam geometry and intensity map optimization in intensity-modulated radiation therapy.
- Authors: Lee EK, Fox T, Crocker I
- Issue date: 2006 Jan 1
- Impact of Spot Size and Spacing on the Quality of Robustly Optimized Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy Plans for Lung Cancer.
- Authors: Liu C, Schild SE, Chang JY, Liao Z, Korte S, Shen J, Ding X, Hu Y, Kang Y, Keole SR, Sio TT, Wong WW, Sahoo N, Bues M, Liu W
- Issue date: 2018 Jun 1