Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMcCafferty, Sean
dc.contributor.authorLevine, Jason
dc.contributor.authorSchwiegerling, Jim
dc.contributor.authorEnikov, Eniko T.
dc.date.accessioned2017-12-21T16:29:33Z
dc.date.available2017-12-21T16:29:33Z
dc.date.issued2017-11-25
dc.identifier.citationGoldmann applanation tonometry error relative to true intracameral intraocular pressure in vitro and in vivo 2017, 17 (1) BMC Ophthalmologyen
dc.identifier.issn1471-2415
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12886-017-0608-y
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/626266
dc.description.abstractBackground: Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) error relative to intracameral intraocular pressure (IOP) has not been examined comparatively in both human cadaver eyes and in live human eyes. Futhermore, correlations to biomechanical corneal properties and positional changes have not been examined directly to intracameral IOP and GAT IOP. Methods: Intracameral IOP was measured via pressure transducer on fifty-eight (58) eyes undergoing cataract surgery and the IOP was modulated manometrically on each patient alternately to 10, 20, and 40 mmHg. IOP was measured using a Perkins tonometer in the supine position on 58 eyes and upright on a subset of 8 eyes. Twenty one (21) fresh human cadaver globes were Intracamerally IOP adjusted and measured via pressure transducer. Intracameral IOP ranged between 5 and 60 mmHg. IOP was measured in the upright position with a Goldmann Applanation Tonometer (GAT) and supine position with a Perkins tonometer. Central corneal thickness (CCT) was also measured. Results: The Goldmann-type tonometer error measured on live human eyes was 5.2 +/- 1.6 mmHg lower than intracameral IOP in the upright position and 7.9 +/- 2.3 mmHg lower in the supine position (p <.05). CCT also indicated a sloped correlation to error (correlation coeff. = 0.18). Cadaver eye IOP measurements were 3.1+/-2. 5 mmHg lower than intracameral IOP in the upright position and 5.4+/- 3.1 mmHg in the supine position (p <.05). Conclusion: Goldmann IOP measures significantly lower than true intracameral IOP by approximately 3 mmHg in vitro and 5 mmHg in vivo. The Goldmann IOP error is increased an additional 2.8 mmHg lower in the supine position. CCT appears to significantly affect the error by up to 4 mmHg over the sample size.
dc.description.sponsorshipNIH SBIR Grant [R43 EY026821-01]; Arizona Eye Consultants, Tucson, AZ; Abbott Medical Optics investigational granten
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherBIOMED CENTRAL LTDen
dc.relation.urlhttps://bmcophthalmol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12886-017-0608-yen
dc.rights© The Author(s). 2017 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.en
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectGlaucomaen
dc.subjectIntraocular pressureen
dc.subjectIOPen
dc.subjectGoldmannen
dc.subjectBiasen
dc.subjectErroren
dc.subjectPerkinsen
dc.subjectTonometeren
dc.subjectApplanationen
dc.subjectCCTen
dc.subjectCentral corneal thicknessen
dc.subjectCRFen
dc.subjectCorneal resistance factoren
dc.subjectIntracameralen
dc.subjectCadaver eyeen
dc.subjectIn vivoen
dc.subjectIn vitroen
dc.subjectHead positionen
dc.subjectUprighten
dc.subjectSupineen
dc.subjectManometricen
dc.subjectCorneal hydrationen
dc.titleGoldmann applanation tonometry error relative to true intracameral intraocular pressure in vitro and in vivoen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.contributor.departmentUniv Arizona, Coll Med, Dept Ophthalmolen
dc.contributor.departmentUniv Arizona, Coll Engn, Dept Mech & Aerospen
dc.contributor.departmentUniv Arizona, Coll Opt Scien
dc.identifier.journalBMC Ophthalmologyen
dc.description.collectioninformationThis item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.en
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen
refterms.dateFOA2018-09-12T00:40:03Z
html.description.abstractBackground: Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) error relative to intracameral intraocular pressure (IOP) has not been examined comparatively in both human cadaver eyes and in live human eyes. Futhermore, correlations to biomechanical corneal properties and positional changes have not been examined directly to intracameral IOP and GAT IOP. Methods: Intracameral IOP was measured via pressure transducer on fifty-eight (58) eyes undergoing cataract surgery and the IOP was modulated manometrically on each patient alternately to 10, 20, and 40 mmHg. IOP was measured using a Perkins tonometer in the supine position on 58 eyes and upright on a subset of 8 eyes. Twenty one (21) fresh human cadaver globes were Intracamerally IOP adjusted and measured via pressure transducer. Intracameral IOP ranged between 5 and 60 mmHg. IOP was measured in the upright position with a Goldmann Applanation Tonometer (GAT) and supine position with a Perkins tonometer. Central corneal thickness (CCT) was also measured. Results: The Goldmann-type tonometer error measured on live human eyes was 5.2 +/- 1.6 mmHg lower than intracameral IOP in the upright position and 7.9 +/- 2.3 mmHg lower in the supine position (p <.05). CCT also indicated a sloped correlation to error (correlation coeff. = 0.18). Cadaver eye IOP measurements were 3.1+/-2. 5 mmHg lower than intracameral IOP in the upright position and 5.4+/- 3.1 mmHg in the supine position (p <.05). Conclusion: Goldmann IOP measures significantly lower than true intracameral IOP by approximately 3 mmHg in vitro and 5 mmHg in vivo. The Goldmann IOP error is increased an additional 2.8 mmHg lower in the supine position. CCT appears to significantly affect the error by up to 4 mmHg over the sample size.


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
s12886-017-0608-y.pdf
Size:
1.471Mb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Final Published Version

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© The Author(s). 2017 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © The Author(s). 2017 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.