Successful Sampling Strategy Advances Laboratory Studies of NMR Logging in Unconsolidated Aquifers
Name:
Behroozmand_et_al-2017-Geophys ...
Size:
612.7Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Final Published Version
Author
Behroozmand, Ahmad A.
Knight, Rosemary
Müller-Petke, Mike

Auken, Esben

Barfod, Adrian A. S.
Ferré, Ty P. A.
Vilhelmsen, Troels N.

Johnson, Carole D.

Christiansen, Anders V.

Affiliation
Univ Arizona, Dept Hydrol & Water ResourcesIssue Date
2017-11-16
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNIONCitation
Successful Sampling Strategy Advances Laboratory Studies of NMR Logging in Unconsolidated Aquifers 2017, 44 (21):11,021 Geophysical Research LettersJournal
Geophysical Research LettersRights
© 2017. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
The nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) technique has become popular in groundwater studies because it responds directly to the presence and mobility of water in a porous medium. There is a need to conduct laboratory experiments to aid in the development of NMR hydraulic conductivity models, as is typically done in the petroleum industry. However, the challenge has been obtaining high-quality laboratory samples from unconsolidated aquifers. At a study site in Denmark, we employed sonic drilling, which minimizes the disturbance of the surrounding material, and extracted twelve 7.6 cm diameter samples for laboratory measurements. We present a detailed comparison of the acquired laboratory and logging NMR data. The agreement observed between the laboratory and logging data suggests that the methodologies proposed in this study provide good conditions for studying NMR measurements of unconsolidated near-surface aquifers. Finally, we show how laboratory sample size and condition impact the NMR measurements.Note
6 month embargo; published online: 4 November 2017.ISSN
00948276Version
Final published versionSponsors
Danish Council for Independent Research, FNU; Stanford UniversityAdditional Links
http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/2017GL074999ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1002/2017GL074999