Eigenstate-specific temperatures in two-level paramagnetic spin lattices
Author
Masthay, Mark B.
Eads, Calley N.
Johnson, Amber N.
Keil, Robert G.
Miller, Philip
Jones, Ross E.
Mashburn, Joe D.

Fannin, Harry B.

Affiliation
Univ Arizona, Dept Chem & BiochemIssue Date
2017-12-07
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
AMER INST PHYSICSCitation
Eigenstate-specific temperatures in two-level paramagnetic spin lattices 2017, 147 (21):214306 The Journal of Chemical PhysicsJournal
The Journal of Chemical PhysicsRights
© 2017 Author(s). Published by AIP Publishing.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
Increasing interest in the thermodynamics of small and/or isolated systems, in combination with recent observations of negative temperatures of atoms in ultracold optical lattices, has stimulated the need for estimating the conventional, canonical temperature T-c(conv) of systems in equilibrium with heat baths using eigenstate-specific temperatures (ESTs). Four distinct ESTs-continuous canonical, discrete canonical, continuous microcanonical, and discrete microcanonical-are accordingly derived for two-level paramagnetic spin lattices (PSLs) in external magnetic fields. At large N, the four ESTs are intensive, equal to T-c(conv), and obey all four laws of thermodynamics. In contrast, for N < 1000, the ESTs of most PSL eigenstates are non-intensive, differ from T-c(conv), and violate each of the thermodynamic laws. Hence, in spite of their similarities to T-c(conv) at large N, the ESTs are not true thermodynamic temperatures. Even so, each of the ESTs manifests a unique functional dependence on energy which clearly specifies the magnitude and direction of their deviation from T-c(conv); the ESTs are thus good temperature estimators for small PSLs. The thermodynamic uncertainty relation is obeyed only by the ESTs of small canonical PSLs; it is violated by large canonical PSLs and by microcanonical PSLs of any size. The ESTs of population-inverted eigenstates are negative (positive) when calculated using Boltzmann (Gibbs) entropies; the thermodynamic implications of these entropically induced differences in sign are discussed in light of adiabatic invariance of the entropies. Potential applications of the four ESTs to nanothermometers and to systems with long-range interactions are discussed. Published by AIP Publishing.Note
12 month embargo; published online: 5 December 2017ISSN
0021-96061089-7690
PubMed ID
29221376Version
Final published versionSponsors
National Science Foundation [NSF-EPS-0132295]; Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAdditional Links
http://aip.scitation.org/doi/10.1063/1.5012914ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1063/1.5012914
Scopus Count
Collections
Related articles
- Resolving the Debate between Boltzmann and Gibbs Entropy: Relative Energy Window Eliminates Thermodynamic Inconsistencies and Allows Negative Absolute Temperatures.
- Authors: Govind Rajan A
- Issue date: 2024 Sep 12
- Meaning of temperature in different thermostatistical ensembles.
- Authors: Hänggi P, Hilbert S, Dunkel J
- Issue date: 2016 Mar 28
- Eigenstate thermalization and ensemble equivalence in few-body fermionic systems.
- Authors: Jacquod P
- Issue date: 2020 Jun
- Nonequivalence of ensembles for long-range quantum spin systems in optical lattices.
- Authors: Kastner M
- Issue date: 2010 Jun 18
- Phase transitions at high energy vindicate negative microcanonical temperature.
- Authors: Buonsante P, Franzosi R, Smerzi A
- Issue date: 2017 May