Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorBadger, Terryen
dc.contributor.authorElgrably, Alonya
dc.creatorElgrably, Alonyaen
dc.date.accessioned2018-02-19T15:53:55Z
dc.date.available2018-02-19T15:53:55Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/626652
dc.description.abstractBackground: Uncontrolled stress-induced hyperglycemia has been shown to increase mortality, prolong ICU length of stay, increase complications, and prolong ICU length of stay. The inadequate management of stress-induced hyperglycemia in the intensive care setting is a persistent gap in quality care. Objective: To implement an evidence-based Stress-induced hyperglycemia protocol in the ICU at NorthBay Medical Center. Design: Descriptive design with pre-and post-intervention measurement. Setting: The Intensive Care Unit at NorthBay Medical Center. Patients: 22 patients with stress-induced hyperglycemia. Eligible patients had a blood glucose level great than or equal to 150 mg/dL. Intervention: Patients with a blood glucose level greater than or equal to 150 mg/dL were started on sliding scale insulin therapy. Patients with a blood glucose level greater than 180 mg/dl the patient were started on an insulin infusion. If the blood glucose levels were <100 mg/dl, insulin therapy was discontinued to prevent hypoglycemia. Blood glucose levels were integrated into ICU multidisciplinary rounds to ensure all patients with stress-induced hyperglycemia were identified. Measurements: ICU length of stay, hospital length of stay, average high blood glucose levels, and number of patients who met criteria but were not started on insulin therapy were measured. Results: The average ICU length of stay pre-protocol implementation (M=4.18, SD=2.48) was greater than the average ICU length of stay post-protocol implementation (M=2.18, SD=1.83). This difference is statistically significant t (20) =2.15, p=0.044; d 0.95. There was no significant 8 difference between pre-protocol implementation hospital length of stay (M=9.27, SD=9.50) and post-protocol implementation hospital length of stay (M=6.27, SD=3.82); t (20) =0.97, p=0.343. There was no significant difference in average blood glucose levels pre-implementation (M=197, SD=69) and post-protocol implementation (M=189, SD=40); t (20) =0.31, p=0.76. Over half (55%) of the patients in the pre-implementation group met criteria for stress-induced hyperglycemia, however, insulin therapy was not initiated by the ICU healthcare provider. Postimplementation, there was 100% compliance with initiating therapy on those patients that met criteria.
dc.language.isoen_USen
dc.publisherThe University of Arizona.en
dc.rightsCopyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author.en
dc.titleImproving Stress-Induced Hyperglycemia Management in the Intensive Care Settingen_US
dc.typetexten
dc.typeElectronic Dissertationen
thesis.degree.grantorUniversity of Arizonaen
thesis.degree.leveldoctoralen
dc.contributor.committeememberBadger, Terryen
dc.contributor.committeememberBuchner, Brianen
dc.contributor.committeememberAhmed, Maqboolen
thesis.degree.disciplineGraduate Collegeen
thesis.degree.disciplineNursingen
thesis.degree.nameD.N.P.en
refterms.dateFOA2018-09-12T01:36:40Z
html.description.abstractBackground: Uncontrolled stress-induced hyperglycemia has been shown to increase mortality, prolong ICU length of stay, increase complications, and prolong ICU length of stay. The inadequate management of stress-induced hyperglycemia in the intensive care setting is a persistent gap in quality care. Objective: To implement an evidence-based Stress-induced hyperglycemia protocol in the ICU at NorthBay Medical Center. Design: Descriptive design with pre-and post-intervention measurement. Setting: The Intensive Care Unit at NorthBay Medical Center. Patients: 22 patients with stress-induced hyperglycemia. Eligible patients had a blood glucose level great than or equal to 150 mg/dL. Intervention: Patients with a blood glucose level greater than or equal to 150 mg/dL were started on sliding scale insulin therapy. Patients with a blood glucose level greater than 180 mg/dl the patient were started on an insulin infusion. If the blood glucose levels were <100 mg/dl, insulin therapy was discontinued to prevent hypoglycemia. Blood glucose levels were integrated into ICU multidisciplinary rounds to ensure all patients with stress-induced hyperglycemia were identified. Measurements: ICU length of stay, hospital length of stay, average high blood glucose levels, and number of patients who met criteria but were not started on insulin therapy were measured. Results: The average ICU length of stay pre-protocol implementation (M=4.18, SD=2.48) was greater than the average ICU length of stay post-protocol implementation (M=2.18, SD=1.83). This difference is statistically significant t (20) =2.15, p=0.044; d 0.95. There was no significant 8 difference between pre-protocol implementation hospital length of stay (M=9.27, SD=9.50) and post-protocol implementation hospital length of stay (M=6.27, SD=3.82); t (20) =0.97, p=0.343. There was no significant difference in average blood glucose levels pre-implementation (M=197, SD=69) and post-protocol implementation (M=189, SD=40); t (20) =0.31, p=0.76. Over half (55%) of the patients in the pre-implementation group met criteria for stress-induced hyperglycemia, however, insulin therapy was not initiated by the ICU healthcare provider. Postimplementation, there was 100% compliance with initiating therapy on those patients that met criteria.


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
azu_etd_16068_sip1_m.pdf
Size:
380.2Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record