Well-being in Military Reserve Health Care Providers Post Deployment or Mobilization
AuthorOnate, Danelle Marie
Keywordsmilitary health care
military health care providers
AdvisorSheppard, Dr. Kate
MetadataShow full item record
PublisherThe University of Arizona.
RightsCopyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author.
AbstractPurpose: To describe well-being in military reserve health care providers post deployment or mobilization Background: A comprehensive literature review exhibited that during a deployment or mobilization, military health care providers endure stressful and uncomfortable situations, spend time away from their family, friends and usual home comforts leaving them feeling completely changed. These circumstances can negatively affect a provider’s well-being. Moreover, although the literature outlines military and psychological symptoms including combat stressors, mental health concerns such as depression and anxiety, job stress, work performance and resiliency, there is a gap in the literature regarding well-being among military health care providers post deployment or mobilization. Methods: This project used a qualitative descriptive methodology with face-to-face interviews to describe the phenomenon of well-being among three United States reserve military health care providers post deployment or mobilization. Data was collected using semi-structured, open ended questions, allowing the participants an opportunity to discuss and further elaborate on their experiences, perspectives and feelings. Each interview began with pre-established questions and further questions and discussions were guided by the participants’ earlier responses. Interviews were audio recorded and transcribed into text, allowing me to identify commonalities of experiences, perspectives and feelings among the participants. Results: Analysis of the interview data revealed information associated with transitions and can be grouped into five categories. The categories that impacted the participants’ well-being post deployment or mobilization include: separation from family and friends, austere living conditions, exhaustion from long work hours, consecutive work days without days off and being unprepared for what was to come. Implications: This project describes well-being in military reserve health care providers post deployment or mobilization. Findings from this small project may be used to develop research studies to describe and understand the concept of well-being among military health care providers. Armed with better understanding, we could then develop interventions to prepare our military health care providers to deliver high quality care during overseas deployment or mobilization while also maintaining their physical and mental well-being.
Degree ProgramGraduate College
Degree GrantorUniversity of Arizona
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Assessment of Hypertension and Military DeploymentsGranado, Nisara Suthun (The University of Arizona., 2008)Introduction: High-stress situations, such as military deployments, may be a risk factor for hypertension. The relationship between the stress triggered by combat deployment and hypertension is unknown. Acute stress from combat conditions can cause a temporary rise in blood pressure, which decreases within hours or days. Cross-sectional studies have shown no association between hypertension and deployment to the 1991 Gulf War or to Vietnam. Self-reported hypertension often is used as an outcome in large population studies. Fair to substantial agreement has been observed between self-reported hypertension and various sources of administrative data, medical records, and blood pressure measurements. The goal of this dissertation was to determine whether recent deployment to Iraq and Afghanistan was associated with new-onset hypertension.Methods: Baseline Millennium Cohort Study questionnaires (July 2001 to June 2003) were completed by 77,047 individuals. Follow-up questionnaires (June 2004 to February 2006) were completed by 55,021 responders. The relationship between new-onset hypertension and history of a recent military deployment was assessed through multivariable logistic regression (N=37,075). Baseline data were analyzed cross-sectionally to assess factors associated with prevalent hypertension (N=70,100). Kappa statistics were used to compare self-reported hypertension with provider diagnosed hypertension and prescription antihypertensive medication dispensed (N=41,129).Results: The 3-year incidence of hypertension was 6.9%. After adjusting for demographic and lifestyle characteristics, deployers without combat exposure were less likely to develop new-onset hypertension compared to nondeployers (odds ratio [OR]=0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.64, 0.85). There was no association between deployment with combat exposure and hypertension compared to nondeployers (OR=0.94; 95% CI: 0.82, 1.07). Among deployers reporting combat exposures, the risk for incident hypertension was 1.31 (95% CI: 1.07, 1.61) compared to deployers not reporting combat exposures. The prevalence of self-reported hypertension at baseline among Cohort members was 10.4%. There was moderate agreement between self-reported hypertension and provider-diagnosed hypertension, as well as antihypertensive medications dispensed.Conclusion: Military service members are adversely affected by hypertension. Although deployers had lower incidence of hypertension compared to nondeployers, individuals reporting combat exposures were more likely to report new-onset hypertension. Self-reported hypertension had moderate reliability compared with provider-diagnosed hypertension and dispensed antihypertensive medication.
Institutional Logics, Extended Rationality, and the Effects of Military Background of Business LeadersHan, Yi (The University of Arizona., 2008)This is a theoretical and empirical study of leadership. Although sociologists have contributed important theories and research on authority and power, there is not yet a developed leadership theory in sociology. On the other hand, leadership studies in other disciplines are not satisfying, and they will not be satisfying in the foreseeable future if they adhere to their basic theoretical orientations, e.g. focusing on leadership personal traits and characteristics. I elaborate the important sociological theories that can be used in the study of leadership. I also intend to link sociological theories of leadership to social background analysis. The social backgrounds considered are family status, education, religion, military service, and more. Particular attention is paid to military background and its impact on business, because military has always been such an important social phenomenon but the theories of it have been controversial.The study of leadership inevitably involves both individuals and their groups. With evidence obtained from different data sources on leaders and on business organizations, I studied the impact of military social background of business leaders. This research unpacks the rise of business leaders with military experience in the late 20th century, using a database on the 20th century Great American Business Leaders. This research also measures the organizational performance of these leaders, incorporating information from Standard & Poor's Compustat database. Statistical techniques like logistic regressions and hierarchical linear models are used in the analysis to test various effects on personal and organizational performance. I found that military experience does not help a business leader in aspects like time taken to become a CEO and time to be a CEO, but it does help organizational performance as measured by profitability. Both rank and number of years in the military contribute to profitability. I also found that ex-military business leaders differ from non-military business leaders in certain organizational behaviors, e.g. they are less likely to downsize the organizations.The theory of institutional logics and social background analysis were combined in this study. I also attempted to link institutional logics with theories of rationality. From the idea of institutional leadership and inter-institutional relationship, I suggested a theory of extended rationality.