A two-point diagnostic for the H ii galaxy Hubble diagram
| dc.contributor.author | Leaf, Kyle | |
| dc.contributor.author | Melia, Fulvio | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2018-03-27T22:49:12Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2018-03-27T22:49:12Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2018-03 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | A two-point diagnostic for the H ii galaxy Hubble diagram 2018, 474 (4):4507 Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society | en |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0035-8711 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1365-2966 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1093/mnras/stx3109 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10150/627132 | |
| dc.description.abstract | A previous analysis of starburst-dominated HII galaxies and HII regions has demonstrated a statistically significant preference for the Friedmann-Robertson-Walker cosmology with zero active mass, known as the R-h = c(t) universe, over Lambda cold dark matter (Lambda CDM) and its related dark-matter parametrizations. In this paper, we employ a two-point diagnostic with these data to present a complementary statistical comparison of Rh = ct with Planck Lambda CDM. Our two-point diagnostic compares, in a pairwise fashion, the difference between the distance modulus measured at two redshifts with that predicted by each cosmology. Our results support the conclusion drawn by a previous comparative analysis demonstrating that Rh = ct is statistically preferred over Planck Lambda CDM. But we also find that the reported errors in the HII measurements may not be purely Gaussian, perhaps due to a partial contamination by non-Gaussian systematic effects. The use of HII galaxies and HII regions as standard candles may be improved even further with a better handling of the systematics in these sources. | |
| dc.description.sponsorship | Chinese Academy of Sciences [2012T1J0011]; Chinese State Administration of Foreign Experts Affairs [GDJ20120491013] | en |
| dc.language.iso | en | en |
| dc.publisher | OXFORD UNIV PRESS | en |
| dc.relation.url | http://academic.oup.com/mnras/article/474/4/4507/4683268 | en |
| dc.rights | © 2017 The Author(s) Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Royal Astronomical Society. | en |
| dc.rights.uri | http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ | |
| dc.subject | galaxies: general | en |
| dc.subject | distance scale | en |
| dc.subject | large-scale structure of Universe | en |
| dc.subject | cosmology: observations | en |
| dc.subject | cosmology: theory | en |
| dc.title | A two-point diagnostic for the H ii galaxy Hubble diagram | en |
| dc.type | Article | en |
| dc.contributor.department | Univ Arizona, Dept Phys | en |
| dc.contributor.department | Univ Arizona, Dept Phys, Program Appl Math | en |
| dc.contributor.department | Univ Arizona, Dept Astron | en |
| dc.identifier.journal | Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society | en |
| dc.description.collectioninformation | This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu. | en |
| dc.eprint.version | Final published version | en |
| refterms.dateFOA | 2018-09-12T07:05:23Z | |
| html.description.abstract | A previous analysis of starburst-dominated HII galaxies and HII regions has demonstrated a statistically significant preference for the Friedmann-Robertson-Walker cosmology with zero active mass, known as the R-h = c(t) universe, over Lambda cold dark matter (Lambda CDM) and its related dark-matter parametrizations. In this paper, we employ a two-point diagnostic with these data to present a complementary statistical comparison of Rh = ct with Planck Lambda CDM. Our two-point diagnostic compares, in a pairwise fashion, the difference between the distance modulus measured at two redshifts with that predicted by each cosmology. Our results support the conclusion drawn by a previous comparative analysis demonstrating that Rh = ct is statistically preferred over Planck Lambda CDM. But we also find that the reported errors in the HII measurements may not be purely Gaussian, perhaps due to a partial contamination by non-Gaussian systematic effects. The use of HII galaxies and HII regions as standard candles may be improved even further with a better handling of the systematics in these sources. |
