Canine and human infection with Borrelia burgdorferi in the New York City metropolitan area
AffiliationUniv Arizona, Inst Environm
SNAP (R) 4Dx (R) Test
MetadataShow full item record
PublisherBIOMED CENTRAL LTD
CitationHerrin, B. H., Beall, M. J., Feng, X., Papeş, M., & Little, S. E. (2018). Canine and human infection with Borrelia burgdorferi in the New York City metropolitan area. Parasites & vectors, 11(1), 187.
JournalPARASITES & VECTORS
Rights© The Author(s). 2018 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Collection InformationThis item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at firstname.lastname@example.org.
AbstractBackground: Autochthonous transmission of Borrelia burgdorferi, the primary agent of Lyme disease in dogs and people in North America, commonly occurs in the northeastern United States, including the New York City metropolitan area, a region with a large human and pet population and broadly diverse demographics and habitats. Methods: We evaluated results from a specific, C6-based serologic assay performed on 234,633 canine samples to compare evidence of past or current infection with B. burgdorferi (sensu stricto) in dogs to county-wide social and environmental factors, as well as to reported cases of Lyme disease in people. Results: The data revealed a wide range of county level percent positive canine test results (1.2-27.3%) and human case reports (0.5-438.7 case reports/100,000 people). Dogs from highly (> 50%) forested areas and counties with lower population density had the highest percent positive test results, at 21.1% and 17.9%, respectively. Canine percent positive tests correlated with population-adjusted human case reports (R-2 = 0.48, P < 0.0001), as well as population density, development intensity, temperature, normalized difference vegetation index, and habitat type. Subsequent multiple regression allowed an accurate prediction of infection risk in dogs (R-2 = 0.90) but was less accurate at predicting human case reports (R-2 = 0.74). Conclusion: In areas where Lyme disease is endemic, canine serology continues to provide insight into risk factors for transmission to both dogs and people although some differences in geographic patterns of canine infection and human disease reports are evident.
VersionFinal published version
SponsorsKrull-Ewing Endowment at Oklahoma State University
- Trends in canine seroprevalence to Borrelia burgdorferi and Anaplasma spp. in the eastern USA, 2010-2017.
- Authors: Dewage BG, Little S, Payton M, Beall M, Braff J, Szlosek D, Buch J, Knupp A
- Issue date: 2019 Oct 14
- Searching for Lyme borreliosis in Australia: results of a canine sentinel study.
- Authors: Irwin PJ, Robertson ID, Westman ME, Perkins M, Straubinger RK
- Issue date: 2017 Mar 13
- Canine infection with Borrelia burgdorferi, Dirofilaria immitis, Anaplasma spp. and Ehrlichia spp. in Canada, 2013-2014.
- Authors: Herrin BH, Peregrine AS, Goring J, Beall MJ, Little SE
- Issue date: 2017 May 19
- Dogs and horses with antibodies to outer-surface protein C as on-time sentinels for ticks infected with Borrelia burgdorferi in New York State in 2011.
- Authors: Wagner B, Erb HN
- Issue date: 2012 Dec 1
- Countrywide serological evaluation of canine prevalence for Anaplasma spp., Borrelia burgdorferi (sensu lato), Dirofilaria immitis and Ehrlichia canis in Mexico.
- Authors: Movilla R, García C, Siebert S, Roura X
- Issue date: 2016 Jul 29