Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorEmery, Marianne
dc.contributor.authorWillis, M Madeline S
dc.contributor.authorHao, Yue
dc.contributor.authorBarry, Kerrie
dc.contributor.authorOakgrove, Khouanchy
dc.contributor.authorPeng, Yi
dc.contributor.authorSchmutz, Jeremy
dc.contributor.authorLyons, Eric
dc.contributor.authorPires, J Chris
dc.contributor.authorEdger, Patrick P
dc.contributor.authorConant, Gavin C
dc.date.accessioned2018-05-03T17:52:14Z
dc.date.available2018-05-03T17:52:14Z
dc.date.issued2018-03-01
dc.identifier.citationEmery M, Willis MMS, Hao Y, Barry K, Oakgrove K, Peng Y, et al. (2018) Preferential retention of genes from one parental genome after polyploidy illustrates the nature and scope of the genomic conflicts induced by hybridization. PLoS Genet 14(3): e1007267. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1007267en_US
dc.identifier.issn1553-7404
dc.identifier.pmid29590103
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pgen.1007267
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/627568
dc.description.abstractPolyploidy is increasingly seen as a driver of both evolutionary innovation and ecological success. One source of polyploid organisms' successes may be their origins in the merging and mixing of genomes from two different species (e.g., allopolyploidy). Using POInT (the Polyploid Orthology Inference Tool), we model the resolution of three allopolyploidy events, one from the bakers' yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae), one from the thale cress (Arabidopsis thaliana) and one from grasses including Sorghum bicolor. Analyzing a total of 21 genomes, we assign to every gene a probability for having come from each parental subgenome (i.e., derived from the diploid progenitor species), yielding orthologous segments across all genomes. Our model detects statistically robust evidence for the existence of biased fractionation in all three lineages, whereby genes from one of the two subgenomes were more likely to be lost than those from the other subgenome. We further find that a driver of this pattern of biased losses is the co-retention of genes from the same parental genome that share functional interactions. The pattern of biased fractionation after the Arabidopsis and grass allopolyploid events was surprisingly constant in time, with the same parental genome favored throughout the lineages' history. In strong contrast, the yeast allopolyploid event shows evidence of biased fractionation only immediately after the event, with balanced gene losses more recently. The rapid loss of functionally associated genes from a single subgenome is difficult to reconcile with the action of genetic drift and suggests that selection may favor the removal of specific duplicates. Coupled to the evidence for continuing, functionally-associated biased fractionation after the A. thaliana At-α event, we suggest that, after allopolyploidy, there are functional conflicts between interacting genes encoded in different subgenomes that are ultimately resolved through preferential duplicate loss.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipUS National Science Foundation [NSF-IOS-1339156]; US Department of Energy [DE-AC02-05CH11231]; Office of Science of the U.S. Department of Energyen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCEen_US
dc.relation.urlhttp://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1007267en_US
dc.rightsThis is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication.en_US
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
dc.titlePreferential retention of genes from one parental genome after polyploidy illustrates the nature and scope of the genomic conflicts induced by hybridization.en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentUniv Arizona, Sch Plant Scien_US
dc.identifier.journalPLOS GENETICSen_US
dc.description.noteOpen access journal.en_US
dc.description.collectioninformationThis item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.en_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.source.journaltitlePLoS genetics
refterms.dateFOA2018-05-03T17:52:15Z


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
journal.pgen.1007267.pdf
Size:
4.207Mb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Final Published Version

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication.