Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorJiang, Han
dc.contributor.authorXia, Jun
dc.contributor.authorCannella, Albert A.
dc.contributor.authorXiao, Ting
dc.date.accessioned2018-05-31T16:40:16Z
dc.date.available2018-05-31T16:40:16Z
dc.date.issued2018-01
dc.identifier.citationJiang H, Xia J, Cannella AA, Xiao T. Do ongoing networks block out new friends? Reconciling the embeddedness constraint dilemma on new alliance partner addition. Strat Mgmt J. 2017;39:217–241. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2695en_US
dc.identifier.issn0143-2095
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/smj.2695
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/627854
dc.description.abstractResearch Summary: This study addresses a theoretical dilemma regarding how alliance network constraint (reflected by network cohesion) affects a firm's alliance formation with new partners. Using a network pluralism approach, we separate a firm's ego alliance network into two activity-based networksan exploratory network and an exploitative networkbased on the primary value chain activity involved in each alliance. We argue that the cohesion of exploratory or exploitative networks has an inverted U-shaped effect on the addition of new partners in the same activity-based network, and a positive effect on the addition of new partners in the other network. Results based on data from the biotechnology industry largely support our predictions with one exception. Our study contributes to both scholarly understanding of network embeddedness and alliance practice. Managerial Summary: The structure of firms' ongoing alliance networks may have paradoxical implications for their efforts to search for and form alliance with new partners. That is, when a firm's alliance partners are tightly connected with each other, the cohesive network tends to both encourage and impede the focal firm to add new partners. We resolve this dilemma by showing that when a firm is deeply entrenched in a cohesive alliance network conducting a certain type of activities (e.g., R&D activities), it may not easily add new R&D alliance partners. However, it may still be able to escape from the cohesive R&D alliance network by seeking new partners conducting other activities (e.g., manufacturing activities).en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherWILEYen_US
dc.relation.urlhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/smj.2695en_US
dc.rightsCopyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.en_US
dc.subjectaddition of new alliance partnersen_US
dc.subjectalliance networken_US
dc.subjectnetwork cohesionen_US
dc.subjectnetwork embeddednessen_US
dc.subjectnetwork pluralismen_US
dc.titleDo ongoing networks block out new friends? Reconciling the embeddedness constraint dilemma on new alliance partner additionen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentUniv Arizona, Eller Coll Management, Dept Management & Orgen_US
dc.identifier.journalSTRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNALen_US
dc.description.note2 years embargo; published online: 14 September 2017en_US
dc.description.collectioninformationThis item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.en_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal accepted manuscripten_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
SMJ_final_2.pdf
Size:
1.527Mb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Final Accepted Manuscript

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record