Name:
DifferentialDiscounting_JEPG_R ...
Size:
1.340Mb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Final Accepted Manuscript
Affiliation
Univ Arizona, Dept Management Informat Syst, Eller Coll ManagementIssue Date
2018-01
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
AMER PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCCitation
Brandimarte, L., Vosgerau, J., & Acquisti, A. (2018). Differential discounting and present impact of past information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 147(1), 74-92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/xge0000372Rights
© 2018 APA, all rights reserved.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
How does information about a person's past, accessed now, affect individuals' impressions of that person? In 2 survey experiments and 2 experiments with actual incentives, we compare whether, when evaluating a person, information about that person's past greedy or immoral behaviors is discounted similarly to information about her past generous or moral behaviors. We find that, no matter how far in the past a person behaved greedily or immorally, information about her negative behaviors is hardly discounted at all. In contrast, information about her past positive behaviors is discounted heavily: recent behaviors are much more influential than behaviors that occurred a long time ago. The lesser discounting of information about immoral and greedy behaviors is not caused by these behaviors being more influential, memorable, extreme, or attention-grabbing; rather, they are perceived as more diagnostic of a person's character than past moral or generous behaviors. The phenomenon of differential discounting of past information has particular relevance in the digital age, where information about people's past is easily retrieved. Our findings have significant implications for theories of impression formation and social information processing.ISSN
1939-22220096-3445
PubMed ID
29154615Version
Final accepted manuscriptSponsors
National Science Foundation [SMA-1327992]Additional Links
http://doi.apa.org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/xge0000372ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1037/xge0000372
Scopus Count
Collections
Related articles
- How selfish is memory for cheaters? Evidence for moral and egoistic biases.
- Authors: Bell R, Schain C, Echterhoff G
- Issue date: 2014 Sep
- Moral character predominates in person perception and evaluation.
- Authors: Goodwin GP, Piazza J, Rozin P
- Issue date: 2014 Jan
- Unethical and inept? The influence of moral information on perceptions of competence.
- Authors: Stellar JE, Willer R
- Issue date: 2018 Feb
- The stereotype of professional roles influences neural responses to moral transgressions: ERP evidence.
- Authors: Lu J, Peng X, Liao C, Cui F
- Issue date: 2019 Jul
- You are fair, but I expect you to also behave unfairly: Positive asymmetry in trait-behavior relations for moderate morality information.
- Authors: Rusconi P, Sacchi S, Capellini R, Brambilla M, Cherubini P
- Issue date: 2017