Can amputation save the hospital? The impact of the Medicare Rural Flexibility Program on demand and welfare
Name:
amputation_save_hospital.pdf
Size:
338.4Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Final Accepted Manuscript
Publisher
ELSEVIER SCIENCE BVCitation
Gowrisankaran, G., Lucarelli, C., Schmidt-Dengler, P., & Town, R. (2018). Can amputation save the hospital? The impact of the Medicare Rural Flexibility Program on demand and welfare. Journal of health economics, 58, 110-122, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhealeco.2018.01.004Journal
JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICSRights
© 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
This paper seeks to understand the impact of the Medicare Rural Hospital Flexibility (Flex) Program on hospital choice and consumer welfare for rural residents. The Flex Program created a new class of hospital, the Critical Access Hospital (CAH), which receives more generous Medicare reimbursements in return for limits on capacity and length of stay. We find that conversion to CAH status resulted in a 4.7 percent drop in inpatient admissions to participating hospitals, almost all of which was driven by factors other than capacity constraints. The Flex Program increased consumer welfare if it prevented the exit of at least 6.5 percent of randomly selected converting hospitals. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.Note
24 month embargo; published online: 7 February 2018ISSN
01676296PubMed ID
29477951Version
Final accepted manuscriptSponsors
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) [1R01HS018424-01A1]; Fondecyt [1130011]Additional Links
http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0167629618300328ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1016/j.jhealeco.2018.01.004