Gender Norms and Discourses Informing College Men’s Perceptions of Heteronormative Sexual Health Responsibilities and HPV Prevention
Name:
Gender_Norms_HPV_for_UA_Reposi ...
Size:
119.0Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Final Accepted Manuscript
Publisher
ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTDCitation
Samantha J. Stanley, Sara Kim & Margaret Jane Pitts (2018) Gender Norms and Discourses Informing College Men’s Perceptions of Heteronormative Sexual Health Responsibilities and HPV Prevention, Communication Quarterly, 66:3, 225-244, DOI: 10.1080/01463373.2017.1356338Journal
COMMUNICATION QUARTERLYRights
© 2018 Eastern Communication Association.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
Focus group data revealed that despite reporting expectations for high levels of sexual activity, college men primarily identifying as heterosexual were ambivalent about sexual health responsibility and their role in preventing human papillomavirus (HPV). Participants identified shared sexual health responsibility as an ideal but invoked heteronormative gender discourses to rationalize inequality in partnered sexual health. Self-categorization processes based on gender may prevent college males from engaging selfand partnered protective behaviors. Yet, self-categorization processes also enabled college men to envision a future relational identity as husband and father in which they engaged protective sexual health behaviors. Although discourses may signify latent benevolent sexism, they may also make room for behavior change through dissonance or messages encouraging superordinate categorization that urges engaging in preventive sexual health behaviors regardless of gender. Implications for self-categorization processes in HPV prevention are discussed.Note
18 month embargo; published online: 10 August 2017ISSN
0146-33731746-4102
Version
Final accepted manuscriptSponsors
Social and Behavioral Sciences Research Institute of the College of Social and Behavioral Sciences at the University of ArizonaAdditional Links
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01463373.2017.1356338ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1080/01463373.2017.1356338