The National Clinical Assessment Tool for Medical Students in the Emergency Department (NCAT-EM)
AffiliationUniv Arizona, Dept Emergency Med
Univ Arizona, Dept Emergency Med
MetadataShow full item record
CitationJung, J., Franzen, D., Lawson, L., Manthey, D., Tews, M., Dubosh, N., et al. (2018). The National Clinical Assessment Tool for Medical Students in the Emergency Department (NCAT-EM). Western Journal of Emergency Medicine: Integrating Emergency Care with Population Health, 19(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2017.10.34834
RightsCopyright: © 2018 Jung et al. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License.
Collection InformationThis item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at firstname.lastname@example.org.
AbstractIntroduction: Clinical assessment of medical students in emergency medicine (EM) clerkships is a highly variable process that presents unique challenges and opportunities. Currently, clerkship directors use institution-specific tools with unproven validity and reliability that may or may not address competencies valued most highly in the EM setting. Standardization of assessment practices and development of a common, valid, specialty-specific tool would benefit EM educators and students. Methods: A two-day national consensus conference was held in March 2016 in the Clerkship Directors in Emergency Medicine (CDEM) track at the Council of Residency Directors in Emergency Medicine (CORD) Academic Assembly in Nashville, TN. The goal of this conference was to standardize assessment practices and to create a national clinical assessment tool for use in EM clerkships across the country. Conference leaders synthesized the literature, articulated major themes and questions pertinent to clinical assessment of students in EM, clarified the issues, and outlined the consensus-building process prior to consensus-building activities. Results: The first day of the conference was dedicated to developing consensus on these key themes in clinical assessment. The second day of the conference was dedicated to discussing and voting on proposed domains to be included in the national clinical assessment tool. A modified Delphi process was initiated after the conference to reconcile questions and items that did not reach an a priori level of consensus. Conclusion: The final tool, the National Clinical Assessment Tool for Medical Students in Emergency Medicine (NCAT-EM) is presented here.
NoteOpen access journal.
VersionFinal published version