ACGME Clinical and Educational Work Hour Standards: Perspectives and Recommendations from Emergency Medicine Educators
AffiliationUniv Arizona, Coll Med Phoenix, Maricopa Med Ctr, Dept Emergency Med
MetadataShow full item record
CitationWolf, S. J, Akhtar, S., Gross, E., Barnes, D., Epter, M., Fisher, J., et al. (2018). ACGME Clinical and Educational Work Hour Standards: Perspectives and Recommendations from Emergency Medicine Educators. Western Journal of Emergency Medicine: Integrating Emergency Care with Population Health, 19(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2017.11.35265
RightsCopyright: © 2018 Wolf et al. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License.
Collection InformationThis item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at firstname.lastname@example.org.
AbstractIntroduction: The American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP) and the Council of Emergency Medicine Residency Directors (CORD) were invited to contribute to the 2016 Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education's (ACGME) Second Resident Duty Hours in the Learning and Working Environment Congress. We describe the joint process used by ACEP and CORD to capture the opinions of emergency medicine (EM) educators on the ACGME clinical and educational work hour standards, formulate recommendations, and inform subsequent congressional testimony. Methods: In 2016 our joint working group of experts in EM medical education conducted a consensus-based. mixed-methods process using survey data from medical education stakeholders in EM and expert iterative discussions to create organizational position statements and recommendations for revisions of work hour standards. A 19-item survey was administered to a convenience sample of 199 EM residency training programs using a national EM educational listserv. Results: A total of 157 educational leaders responded to the survey; 92 of 157 could be linked to specific programs, yielding a targeted response rate of 46.2% (92/199) of programs. Respondents commented on the impact of clinical and educational work-hour standards on patient safety, programmatic and personnel costs, resident caseload, and educational experience. Using survey results, comments, and iterative discussions. organizational recommendations were crafted and submitted to the ACGME. Conclusion: EM educators believe that ACGME clinical and educational work hour standards negatively impact the learning environment and are not optimal for promoting patient safety or the development of resident professional citizenship.
NoteOpen access journal.
VersionFinal published version