• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • UA Graduate and Undergraduate Research
    • UA Theses and Dissertations
    • Dissertations
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • UA Graduate and Undergraduate Research
    • UA Theses and Dissertations
    • Dissertations
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of UA Campus RepositoryCommunitiesTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsPublisherJournalThis CollectionTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsPublisherJournal

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    About

    AboutUA Faculty PublicationsUA DissertationsUA Master's ThesesUA Honors ThesesUA PressUA YearbooksUA CatalogsUA Libraries

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    Conditional Exploitation and Context-Dependent Fitness Consequences of Pollination Mutualisms

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Thumbnail
    Name:
    azu_etd_16485_sip1_m.pdf
    Size:
    3.691Mb
    Format:
    PDF
    Download
    Author
    Richman, Sarah Kelley
    Issue Date
    2018
    Keywords
    Foraging
    Mutualism
    Nectar Robbing
    Plant Reproduction
    Pollination
    Species Interactions
    Advisor
    Bronstein, Judith L.
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Publisher
    The University of Arizona.
    Rights
    Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction, presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author.
    Abstract
    Mutualisms are classically modeled as obligate, pairwise interactions in which individuals increase each other’s fitness through the exchange of resources or services. Theoretically, the interaction should be unstable because the positive feedback of reciprocal fitness exchange leads to unchecked population growth. Furthermore, the benefit gained by cheating (taking a mutualistic benefit without reciprocating) should be so great that the cheating strategy takes over and the mutualism ceases to persist. Because mutualism is found across the tree of life, identifying the mechanisms permitting mutualism persistence has been a goal for ecologists and evolutionary biologists. In nature, mutualisms are rarely as simplistic as described in the classical models. In particular, they are often complicated by the many direct and indirect interactions within which they are embedded. For example, a species may interact with more than one mutualist simultaneously, and the interaction between those two species will feed back to its own performance. Mutualisms are also prone to exploitation by additional species that render resources or services not provided for them. These individuals directly and indirectly affect the performance of mutualist species. The complexity of the larger network of interactions creates context-dependent outcomes of mutualism: that is, the relative costs and benefits of being a mutualist changes in response to the environment. In order to identify mechanisms of mutualism persistence, it is necessary to understand the context-dependent processes that shape mutualistic interactions. A classic example of mutualism embedded within a larger interaction network is plant-pollinator interactions. Many pollination systems are facultative, and plants and pollinators often interact with more than one species. Floral larcenists, including nectar robbers, exploit floral resources provided to pollinators. The exploitation of floral resources is variable in space and time, making the costs (and relative benefits) to plants and pollinators variable as well. In this study, I examine the context-dependency of pollination mutualisms by quantifying costs and benefits to plants, pollinators, and nectar robbers in different environments. First, I measure the consequences of secondary nectar robbing (foraging for nectar through perforations in floral tissue created by another organism) for male and female reproduction in a hummingbird-pollinated plant, finding significant decreases in female function but not male function. Second, I examine the degree to which primary nectar robbers (organisms that perforate floral tissue) facilitate secondary nectar robbers, given that they are also competing for nectar. I show that the benefit of facilitation does not overcome the cost of competition for secondary nectar-robbing bumble bees, because secondary robbing is in general a more costly behavior than pollinating. Finally, I quantify the cost of inter- and intraspecific competition between a pure pollinator species and a species that acts as a secondary robber in certain contexts. I show that intraspecific competition in each species is stronger than interspecific competition, indicating that the species can coexist. This work advances our knowledge of mutualism by taking into account the net fitness effects for mutualist individuals embedded within a larger interaction network. Understanding these fitness differences allows us to make predictions about resulting population dynamics and make inferences about the stability of mutualism.
    Type
    text
    Electronic Dissertation
    Degree Name
    Ph.D.
    Degree Level
    doctoral
    Degree Program
    Graduate College
    Ecology & Evolutionary Biology
    Degree Grantor
    University of Arizona
    Collections
    Dissertations

    entitlement

     
    The University of Arizona Libraries | 1510 E. University Blvd. | Tucson, AZ 85721-0055
    Tel 520-621-6442 | repository@u.library.arizona.edu
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2017  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.