Evaluating Gravity-Flow Irrigation with Lessons from Yuma, Arizona, USA
AffiliationUniv Arizona, Dept Agr & Resource Econ
Univ Arizona, Maricopa Agr Ctr, Dept Soil Water & Environm Sci
Univ Arizona, Water Resources Res Ctr
Univ Arizona, Dept Soil Water & Environm Sci
MetadataShow full item record
CitationFrisvold G, Sanchez C, Gollehon N, Megdal SB, Brown P. Evaluating Gravity-Flow Irrigation with Lessons from Yuma, Arizona, USA. Sustainability. 2018; 10(5):1548.
Rights© 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Collection InformationThis item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at firstname.lastname@example.org.
AbstractMany consider gravity-flow irrigation inefficient and deride its use. Yet, there are cases where gravity-flow irrigation can play an important role in highly productive and profitable agriculture. This perspective article reviews the literature on the profitability and efficiency of gravity systems. It then reviews the history of water management in Yuma, Arizona, which is one of the most productive agricultural areas in the United States. Through extensive changes in irrigation technologies, changes in production practices, and investments in irrigation infrastructure, Yuma agriculture dramatically shifted from perennial and summer-centric crop production to winter-centric, multi-crop systems that are focused on high-value vegetable crops. These innovations have led to improvement in various irrigation efficiency measures and overall water conservation. Return flows from the system, which were once characterized as an indicator of inefficiency, provide valuable environmental services to the Colorado River Delta ecosystem. Yuma's history illustrates that innovative gravity-flow systems can be productive and water-conserving, and that a system-wide perspective is critical in evaluating irrigation systems.
NoteOpen Access Journal.
VersionFinal published version
SponsorsNational Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's Regional Integrated Sciences and Assessments (RISA) program [NA12OAR4310124]; Climate Assessment for the Southwest program at the University of Arizona