Gender wage gaps and risky vs. secure employment: An experimental analysis
Name:
RAGenderRev_final_Complete.pdf
Size:
996.0Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Final Accepted Manuscript
Publisher
ELSEVIER SCIENCE BVCitation
Jung, S., Choe, C., & Oaxaca, R. L. (2018). Gender wage gaps and risky vs. secure employment: An experimental analysis. Labour Economics, 52, 112-121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2018.04.006Journal
LABOUR ECONOMICSRights
© 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
In addition to discrimination, market power, and human capital, gender differences in risk preferences might also contribute to observed gender wage gaps. We conduct laboratory experiments in which subjects choose between a risky (in terms of exposure to unemployment) and a secure job after being assigned in early rounds to both types of jobs. Both jobs involve the same typing task. The risky job adds the element of a known probability that the typing opportunity will not be available in any given period. Subjects were informed of the exogenous risk premium being offered for the risky job. Women were more likely than men to select the secure job, and these job choices accounted for between 40% and 77% of the gender wage gap in the experiments. A method for classifying subjects according to risk preferences is derived from the theoretical framework and further demonstrates the higher incidence of risk aversion among women.Note
24 month embargo; published online: 24 April 2018ISSN
09275371Version
Final accepted manuscriptSponsors
University of Arizona; Georgia State University; Kent State University; University of Paris I/Paris School of Economics; Paris School of Economics [Fond de Recherche PSE 2014/2015-Dossier N4]Additional Links
http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0927537118300356ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1016/j.labeco.2018.04.006
