An adaptive semantic matching paradigm for reliable and valid language mapping in individuals with aphasia
AffiliationUniv Arizona, Dept Speech Language & Hearing Sci
MetadataShow full item record
CitationWilson SM, Yen M, Eriksson DK. An adaptive semantic matching paradigm for reliable and valid language mapping in individuals with aphasia. Hum Brain Mapp. 2018;39:3285–3307. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.24077
JournalHUMAN BRAIN MAPPING
Rights© 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Collection InformationThis item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at firstname.lastname@example.org.
AbstractResearch on neuroplasticity in recovery from aphasia depends on the ability to identify language areas of the brain in individuals with aphasia. However, tasks commonly used to engage language processing in people with aphasia, such as narrative comprehension and picture naming, are limited in terms of reliability (test-retest reproducibility) and validity (identification of language regions, and not other regions). On the other hand, paradigms such as semantic decision that are effective in identifying language regions in people without aphasia can be prohibitively challenging for people with aphasia. This paper describes a new semantic matching paradigm that uses an adaptive staircase procedure to present individuals with stimuli that are challenging yet within their competence, so that language processing can be fully engaged in people with and without language impairments. The feasibility, reliability and validity of the adaptive semantic matching paradigm were investigated in sixteen individuals with chronic post-stroke aphasia and fourteen neurologically normal participants, in comparison to narrative comprehension and picture naming paradigms. All participants succeeded in learning and performing the semantic paradigm. Test-retest reproducibility of the semantic paradigm in people with aphasia was good (Dice coefficient = 0.66), and was superior to the other two paradigms. The semantic paradigm revealed known features of typical language organization (lateralization; frontal and temporal regions) more consistently in neurologically normal individuals than the other two paradigms, constituting evidence for validity. In sum, the adaptive semantic matching paradigm is a feasible, reliable and valid method for mapping language regions in people with aphasia.
Note12 month embargo; published online: 17 April 2018
VersionFinal accepted manuscript
SponsorsNational Institutes of Health (National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders) [R01 DC013270, R21 DC016080]
- Distinct loci of lexical and semantic access deficits in aphasia: Evidence from voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping and diffusion tensor imaging.
- Authors: Harvey DY, Schnur TT
- Issue date: 2015 Jun
- Functional reorganization of language networks for semantics and syntax in chronic stroke: Evidence from MEG.
- Authors: Kielar A, Deschamps T, Jokel R, Meltzer JA
- Issue date: 2016 Aug
- Validity and reliability of four language mapping paradigms.
- Authors: Wilson SM, Bautista A, Yen M, Lauderdale S, Eriksson DK
- Issue date: 2017
- The relationships between the amount of spared tissue, percent signal change, and accuracy in semantic processing in aphasia.
- Authors: Sims JA, Kapse K, Glynn P, Sandberg C, Tripodis Y, Kiran S
- Issue date: 2016 Apr
- Poststroke aphasia recovery assessed with functional magnetic resonance imaging and a picture identification task.
- Authors: Szaflarski JP, Eaton K, Ball AL, Banks C, Vannest J, Allendorfer JB, Page S, Holland SK
- Issue date: 2011 Jul-Aug