Defining Ordinary and Natural Conditions for State Navigability Determinations
KeywordsArizona Geological Survey Contributed Reports
MetadataShow full item record
CitationFuller, J.E., 2018, Defining Ordinary and Natural Conditions for State Navigability Determinations. Arizona Geological Survey Contributed Report CR-18-B, 135p.
DescriptionEXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Every State receives title to the beds of its navigable rivers when it joins the Union. The streambeds of navigable rivers become sovereign lands to be held for the public trust and to preserve corridors of trade and travel on the rivers. States own the beds of only the navigable waterways. Therefore, before a State can establish a claim to a specific river, it must first demonstrate that river was, or could have been, navigated by boats or used to float logs as of the time of Statehood. Furthermore, federal law requires that each river’s navigability be determined at a time when it was in an “ordinary and natural” condition, rather the condition of the river at the time of the navigability determination, or at Statehood, if the river’s navigability had already been altered by humans. While federal courts require consideration of a river’s navigability in its ordinary and natural condition, the courts have provided only minimal direction regarding the scientific definition of the terms “ordinary” and “natural” with respect to navigability. This paper recommends technical definitions for both terms relative to a river’s flow rate, as well as to the physical condition of the river’s boating channel. Ordinary flow is defined as the range of flows between base flow and the flow rate that creates the river’s ordinary high-water mark. The ordinary physical condition of the river is defined as the portion of the floodplain that includes the low flow channel up to the ordinary high-water mark. Natural is defined as the conditions (for both flow rate and channel characteristics) absent the impact of humans. Recommended procedures are provided that can be used to determine if a river is still in its natural condition, or if not, how to obtain information that describes the river’s boating characteristics prior to human impacts on navigability. In addition, five case histories are briefly summarized to illustrate the types of technical issues that have been raised in recent navigability decisions in Arizona and Alaska regarding the rivers’ ordinary and natural conditions.
RightsArizona Geological Survey. All rights reserved.
Collection InformationDocuments in the AZGS Document Repository collection are made available by the Arizona Geological Survey (AZGS) and the University Libraries at the University of Arizona. For more information about items in this collection, please contact firstname.lastname@example.org.
North Bounding Coordinate71.0689
South Bounding Coordinate23.2268
West Bounding Coordinate-167.186
East Bounding Coordinate-63.123
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Dynamic Management of a Surface and Groundwater System on Both Sides of the Lower Yellow RiverLingen, Carl; Buras, Nathan; Department of Hydrology & Water Resources, The University of Arizona (Department of Hydrology and Water Resources, University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ), 1987)This paper analyzes the management problem of the conjunctive use of surface and ground water in an irrigation system on both sides of the Lower Yellow River. For this purpose, a stochastic dynamic programming model is developed. In the model, the statistical characteristics of seasonal rainfall within 2 years are considered; groundwater level control is also emphasized in order to prevent soil salinity and waterlogging. Through computer calculations, optimal operation policies are obtained for efficient conjunctive use of surface and groundwater. These policies take into account the interactions between pumping groundwater by farmers, canal diversions by irrigation system managers, and the physical response of the stream- aquifer system, and minimize the total operation costs. In this paper, we take an irrigation district, the People's Victory Canal System, as an example to illustrate the development and solution of the model. At the same time, the effects of system parameters, including surface irrigation efficiency and rainfall recharge coefficient, on the optimal policies or total operation costs, are discussed. The analytical results in this example indicate that the variation in optimal operation costs caused by the proportion of rainfall infiltrated is small, but the effect of surface irrigation efficiency on the costs is significant. Hence, the surface irrigation efficiency must be increased as much as possible. Then, efficient conjunctive use of surface and groundwater can be attained with the optimal policies.