Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorEubank, Louis
dc.contributor.authorLee, Kwan S.
dc.contributor.authorSeder, David B.
dc.contributor.authorStrout, Tania
dc.contributor.authorDarrow, Matthew
dc.contributor.authorMacDonald, Catherine
dc.contributor.authorMay, Teresa
dc.contributor.authorRiker, Richard R.
dc.contributor.authorKern, Karl B.
dc.date.accessioned2018-10-10T21:20:31Z
dc.date.available2018-10-10T21:20:31Z
dc.date.issued2018-09
dc.identifier.citationEubank, L., Lee, K. S., Seder, D. B., Strout, T., Darrow, M., MacDonald, C., ... & Kern, K. B. (2018). Approaches to community consultation in exception from informed consent: Analysis of scope, efficiency, and cost at two centers. Resuscitation, 130, 81-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2018.06.031en_US
dc.identifier.issn03009572
dc.identifier.pmid29964145
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.resuscitation.2018.06.031
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/630108
dc.description.abstractObjectives: Community consultation (CC) is fundamental to the Exception from Informed Consent (EFIC) process for emergency research, designed to inform and receive feedback from the target study population about potential risks and benefits. To better understand the effectiveness of different techniques for CC, we evaluated EFIC processes at two centers participating in a trial of early cardiac catheterization following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Methods: We studied the Institutional Review Board-approved CC activities at Maine Medical Center (MMC) and University of Arizona (AZ) in support of NCT02387398. In Maine, the public was consulted by survey at a professional basketball game and in the emergency department waiting room (in-person group), by multimedia direction to an online website (online group), and by mail (mailing group). Arizona respondents were either approached at a county fair (in-person group) or were directed to an online survey (online group) via social media advertising. Results: Among 2185 survey respondents, approval rates were high for community involvement and personal participation without individual consent. Community consultation using in-person, online, and mailed surveys offered slightly different approval rates, and the rate of responses by modality differed by age and education level but not ethnicity. Print advertising was the least cost effective at $ 442 per completed survey. Conclusions: Canvassing at public events was the most efficient mode of performing CC, with approval rates similar to mailings, online surveys, and canvassing in other locations. Print advertisements in local papers had a low yield and cost more than other approaches.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipArizona Biomedical Research Commission through an Arizona Biomedical Investigator Award (AZ BIG) entitled, "A Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial of Early Coronary Angiography versus No Early Angiography for Post-Cardiac Arrest Patients without ECG ST Segment [ADHS14-082985]en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherELSEVIER IRELAND LTDen_US
dc.relation.urlhttps://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0300957218303174en_US
dc.rights© 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.subjectExceptionen_US
dc.subjectConsenten_US
dc.subjectEFICen_US
dc.subjectCommunityen_US
dc.subjectConsultationen_US
dc.subjectResearchen_US
dc.titleApproaches to community consultation in exception from informed consent: Analysis of scope, efficiency, and cost at two centersen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentUniv Arizona, Div Cardiol, Sarver Heart Ctren_US
dc.identifier.journalRESUSCITATIONen_US
dc.description.note12 month embargo; published online: 28 June 2018en_US
dc.description.collectioninformationThis item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.en_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal accepted manuscripten_US
dc.source.journaltitleResuscitation
dc.source.volume130
dc.source.beginpage81
dc.source.endpage87


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
EFIC_Manuscript_2nd_revison_Fi ...
Size:
280.5Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Final Accepted Manuscript

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record